From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sa-prd-fep-047.btinternet.com (mailomta22-sa.btinternet.com [213.120.69.28]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA94F3858D37 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 14:26:32 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org BA94F3858D37 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dronecode.org.uk Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dronecode.org.uk Received: from sa-prd-rgout-003.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net ([10.2.38.6]) by sa-prd-fep-047.btinternet.com with ESMTP id <20221030142631.IFOD8034.sa-prd-fep-047.btinternet.com@sa-prd-rgout-003.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net>; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 14:26:31 +0000 Authentication-Results: btinternet.com; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=jonturney@btinternet.com; bimi=skipped X-SNCR-Rigid: 6139429040FD1F68 X-Originating-IP: [86.139.199.187] X-OWM-Source-IP: 86.139.199.187 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: jonturney@btinternet.com X-VadeSecure-score: verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvgedruddtgdeiiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemuceutffkvffkuffjvffgnffgvefqofdpqfgfvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucenucfjughrpefkffggfgfuvfhfhfgjtgfgsehtjeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpeflohhnucfvuhhrnhgvhicuoehjohhnrdhtuhhrnhgvhiesughrohhnvggtohguvgdrohhrghdruhhkqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefgledugfeghfetteeuleeiledtudefveeiudeigfduleeukedtueetffetvdehjeenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecukfhppeekiedrudefledrudelledrudekjeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopegludelvddrudeikedruddruddtiegnpdhinhgvthepkeeirddufeelrdduleelrddukeejpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepjhhonhdrthhurhhnvgihsegurhhonhgvtghouggvrdhorhhgrdhukhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepvddprhgtphhtthhopegtrhgusegrtghmrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtoheptgihghifihhnqdgrphhpshestgihghifihhnrdgtohhm X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean Received: from [192.168.1.106] (86.139.199.187) by sa-prd-rgout-003.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net (5.8.716.04) (authenticated as jonturney@btinternet.com) id 6139429040FD1F68; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 14:26:31 +0000 Message-ID: <34c70f4f-fa6a-8504-b9ef-158d97940ce8@dronecode.org.uk> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 14:26:30 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.0 Subject: Re: [ITA] lz4 Content-Language: en-GB To: Chad Dougherty , "cygwin-apps@cygwin.com" References: <5ce4b751-070d-a8df-6e7d-ced5f4e61a66@acm.org> <5efaf04b-5030-0ea2-2763-8bd0bb773255@acm.org> From: Jon Turney In-Reply-To: <5efaf04b-5030-0ea2-2763-8bd0bb773255@acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1192.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_SPF_HELO,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 24/10/2022 01:39, Chad Dougherty wrote: > On 2022-10-23 13:31, Adam Dinwoodie wrote: >> On Sat, 22 Oct 2022 at 21:59, Chad Dougherty wrote: >>> I'd like to adopt the lz4 library that is currently listed as orphaned. >>> >>> I've updated the cygport to the current version, 1.9.4: >>> https://github.com/crd477/lz4-cygport >> >> I've not tested the actual compilation, but I have done some test >> builds, and this all looks good to me! >> > > Great! Looks like 'doc/lz4_manual.html' is created in the source directory by the build. That should be listed in DIFF_EXCLUDES, and maybe installed to be included in the devel package? >>> Also, is it expected that I should also take the >>> mingw64-{i686,x86_64}-lz4 packages too? >> >> AIUI that's preferred but not required; they're separate packages, so >> it's entirely possible for them to have separate maintainers. > > OK, I updated them here: > https://github.com/crd477/mingw64-x86_64-lz4-cygport > https://github.com/crd477/mingw64-i686-lz4-cygport > > I've had less experience with cross-compiling but I think they're > correct nevertheless. You should 'git rm' the patches which are no longer used. I added these to your authorized packages. Thanks!