Re: [Bug] setup regression

[Jon Turney <jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk>]

On 22/09/2022 17:56, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Achim Gratz writes:
>> Achim Gratz writes:
>>> I had updated setup to 2.921 recently, so I rolled it back to 2.920 and
>>> this version does the package selection correctly.  I haven't yet looked
>>> what commit is responsible, but whatever the cause of the regression is
>>> still in 2.922 as well.
>>
>> The most likely change responsible for this is the additions in
>> package_meta.cc in commit c99e4c14911181636892355a4f1855024051ea1d.  I
>> might not be able to check this tomorrow, though I'll try to free up
>> some time for that.
> 
> That was indeed the culprit.  I've reverted just these two hunks on top
> of release_2.922 and things worked again.
> 

Yes, looking again at that change, the first hunk in package_meta.cc, 
changing Install_action doesn't look right.

If I remember correctly action=Install_action, desired=empty package 
version (evaluating as a boolean is false) means "install the solver's 
preferred version", so converting that to NoChange_action seems wrong.

I'm kind of confused how to reproduce this, or why it decided to install 
only some things, rather than nothing.

Christian,

 From your reply to 
https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-apps/2022-August/042212.html, it 
seems this change is meant to handle the case where 'I' is pressed but 
the package isn't accessible?  Although I don't seem quite how.