From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 113321 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2018 03:53:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 113283 invoked by uid 89); 7 Oct 2018 03:53:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Canada, canada, cygwincom, cygwin.com X-HELO: smtp-out-so.shaw.ca Received: from smtp-out-so.shaw.ca (HELO smtp-out-so.shaw.ca) (64.59.136.137) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 Oct 2018 03:53:04 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.114] ([24.64.240.204]) by shaw.ca with ESMTP id 907ogc3QHwyxU907pgIoSn; Sat, 06 Oct 2018 21:53:02 -0600 Reply-To: Brian.Inglis@SystematicSw.ab.ca Subject: Re: mintty should have skipped one version To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: From: Brian Inglis Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <3cb57895-9fdd-0007-f7bd-a8932439b7aa@SystematicSw.ab.ca> Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2018 03:53:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-10/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 On 2018-10-06 21:32, Thomas Wolff wrote: > I think I uploaded mintty 2.9.3 with a dedicated mintty-2.9.3-0.hint file with > the first two lines > curr: 2.9.3-0 > prev: 2.9.1-0 > but setup still offers 2.9.2 as a choice. Did I miss the point in the upload > procedure? Maybe use override.hint instead as described in: https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2018-08/msg00047.html where replace-versions should reference 2.9.2-?, and should the releases all be ...-0 rather than the standard ...-1? -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.