From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sa-prd-fep-040.btinternet.com (mailomta4-sa.btinternet.com [213.120.69.10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 904F43861838 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 15:07:42 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 904F43861838 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dronecode.org.uk Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk Received: from sa-prd-rgout-001.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net ([10.2.38.4]) by sa-prd-fep-040.btinternet.com with ESMTP id <20200804150741.TKPH5290.sa-prd-fep-040.btinternet.com@sa-prd-rgout-001.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 16:07:41 +0100 Authentication-Results: btinternet.com; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=jonturney@btinternet.com X-Originating-IP: [31.51.206.146] X-OWM-Source-IP: 31.51.206.146 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: jonturney@btinternet.com X-VadeSecure-score: verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrjeeigdekhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemuceutffkvffkuffjvffgnffgvefqofdpqfgfvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtgfesthekredttdefjeenucfhrhhomheplfhonhcuvfhurhhnvgihuceojhhonhdrthhurhhnvgihsegurhhonhgvtghouggvrdhorhhgrdhukheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepjedtgfduledtueetuddvjeeghfekkeffgeelhfeghfetteekueekuddtueeijedvnecuffhomhgrihhnpehsohhurhgtvgifrghrvgdrohhrghdptgihghifihhnrdgtohhmnecukfhppeefuddrhedurddvtdeirddugeeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehhvghloheplgduledvrdduieekrddurdduuddungdpihhnvghtpeefuddrhedurddvtdeirddugeeipdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepoehjohhnrdhtuhhrnhgvhiesughrohhnvggtohguvgdrohhrghdruhhkqecuuefqffgjpeekuefkvffokffogfdprhgtphhtthhopeeotgihghifihhnqdgrphhpshestgihghifihhnrdgtohhmqedprhgtphhtthhopeeokhgsrhhofihnsegtohhrnhgvlhhlrdgvughuqe X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean Received: from [192.168.1.111] (31.51.206.146) by sa-prd-rgout-001.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net (5.8.340) (authenticated as jonturney@btinternet.com) id 5ED99EC90A2C04EA; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 16:07:41 +0100 Subject: Re: Fix for php To: "cygwin-apps@cygwin.com" References: <7ffa5319-b52a-d452-98c8-2acb9dffbec7@cornell.edu> From: Jon Turney Message-ID: <3df647f8-6cac-4baf-4787-72c817dfc574@dronecode.org.uk> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 16:07:41 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7ffa5319-b52a-d452-98c8-2acb9dffbec7@cornell.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FORGED_SPF_HELO, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cygwin package maintainer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 15:07:48 -0000 On 04/08/2020 15:08, Ken Brown via Cygwin-apps wrote: > On 7/21/2020 5:24 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin-apps wrote: >> This is a follow-up to >> >>    https://sourceware.org/pipermail/cygwin/2020-July/245623.html >> >> As I explained there, a patch applied to the Cygwin build causes php >> to often call mmap with MAP_FIXED, and some of these calls fail. >> Removing the relevant hunk of the patch fixes the reported problem, >> and I don't see any reason why that hunk should be needed. >> >> Obviously Yaakov had a reason for applying that hunk, and I'm guessing >> (hoping) that the reason is no longer applicable. >> >> Ideally, someone should ITA php and deal with this.  That person will >> not be me.   I don't use php and I know nothing about it.  If no one >> steps forward, I would be willing to do a one-time non-maintainer upload. > > No one has stepped forward, and Yaakov hasn't responded to say why he > needed the problematic portion of the patch.  In view of the recent post > on the cygwin list > >   https://sourceware.org/pipermail/cygwin/2020-August/245752.html > > I think I should probably go ahead with an NMU.  Any opinions? As a practical matter, anyone who can change cygwin-pkg-maint could upload anything, after jumping through sufficient hoops. (In the interest of making life easier for those people, calm doesn't usually require them to jump through those hoops (see [1]), allowing them to: - upload orphaned packages - push to any packaging repository [1] https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-apps/2020-February/039819.html) > Jon, are you now the de facto packaging czar who can authorize this? No, I don't think so. My perspective is that, by virtue of having the necessary access and being trusted to use it sensibly, you are already authorized. Thanks for looking into this issue.