From: Jon Turney <jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk>
To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH setup] Allow setup to parse more than 3 versions from the setup.ini file
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 10:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <404c26b1-44ed-d7ec-a90a-a46017d761c2@dronecode.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d216nguv.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
On 08/06/2015 20:24, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
>> I'm not against adding some functionality along these lines (provided
>> you also fix upset), but I'm not so sure about the broad definition of
>> the version state pattern. It feels as generating problems down the
>> road. Think setup.hint. Your patch would requite to recognize more or
>> less any string as version state:
>
> Thats easily fixable by requiring a constant prefix ("ver-" or even just
> "v" looks like something that should work).
Agreed.
> But besides that issue I don't think that setup.exe makes this easily
> useable. If I understand the motivation of John correctly, he'd want to
> keep an older version of the X server installable, or maybe as another
> example let's say I'd want to make it possible to keep perl-5.14 around
> for a while. I don't think people would want to click on hundreds of
> chooser boxes until they have some set of old versions that are (or
> maybe not) working together. This is only useful if that set of old
> packages can somehow be ganged together and switched all at once, IMHO.
> This probably means a meta-package that pulls in versioned dependencies.
That is indeed another piece of the puzzle, and something I intend on
working on.
> The dirty little secret of setup is that it already has those versioned
> dependencies and can probably also deal with different dependencies for
> each trust level and replace packages (in other words, the obsoletiohn
> dance we're normally doing may be unnecessary). It also has recommends,
> suggests, depends and conflicts. These features have quite likely
> bit-rotted and documentation is almost non-existing, but they're already
> built in.
'never finished' rather than 'bit-rotted'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-31 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-03 16:30 Jon TURNEY
2015-06-08 13:43 ` Corinna Vinschen
2015-06-08 19:24 ` Achim Gratz
2016-08-31 10:48 ` Jon Turney [this message]
2016-08-31 10:48 ` Jon Turney
2016-12-06 14:41 ` Jon Turney
2016-12-06 17:22 ` Jon Turney
2016-12-06 18:43 ` Corinna Vinschen
2017-10-09 19:32 ` Jon Turney
2017-11-03 13:38 ` Jon Turney
2017-11-03 20:20 ` Achim Gratz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=404c26b1-44ed-d7ec-a90a-a46017d761c2@dronecode.org.uk \
--to=jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk \
--cc=cygwin-apps@cygwin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).