From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16173 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2008 18:52:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 16158 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Apr 2008 18:52:04 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from motoko.lapo.it (HELO mail.lapo.it) (88.198.0.105) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:51:38 +0000 Received: (qmail 8676 invoked by uid 89); 15 Apr 2008 18:51:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cyberlife.home.lapo.it) (lapo@lapo.it@81.74.40.71) by 0 with ESMTPA; 15 Apr 2008 18:51:34 -0000 Message-ID: <4804F929.60401@lapo.it> Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:52:00 -0000 From: Lapo Luchini User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080312) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Let's start a Cygwin 1.7 release area References: <20080413094246.GJ23852@calimero.vinschen.de> <20080413193513.GA13302@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20080414095628.GA4069@calimero.vinschen.de> <20080414143631.GB18398@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <48041AC2.DA789E78@dessent.net> <20080415085515.GW23852@calimero.vinschen.de> <20080415090849.GZ23852@calimero.vinschen.de> <20080415141730.GA21313@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20080415154400.GL23852@calimero.vinschen.de> <20080415175923.GA21976@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20080415183856.GM23852@calimero.vinschen.de> In-Reply-To: <20080415183856.GM23852@calimero.vinschen.de> OpenPGP: id=C8F252FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00219.txt.bz2 Corinna Vinschen wrote: > I will not further argue against using "Cygwin Project\Cygwin" or > just "Cygwin". > I guess the one name no one can strongly argue against is the one we're using right now: "perfect" or "outdated" as it may be, it has at least one reason to be (retro-compatibility). PS: my only WinXP box is still waiting for his motherboard back from RMA... I'll try qemu to test cygwin-1.7 and, if it's not too slow, produce updated packages for both 1.5 and 1.7 (or is 1.7 "near enough" that is better to update that first?). -- Lapo Luchini lapo@lapo.it (OpenPGP & X.509) www.lapo.it (Jabber, ICQ, MSN)