From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20241 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2009 18:11:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 20229 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jan 2009 18:11:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (HELO mail.lysator.liu.se) (130.236.254.3) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:11:35 +0000 Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B89B4005B for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 19:11:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.33] (81-234-184-159-o1095.tbon.telia.com [81.234.184.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2022F40006 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 19:11:26 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <496641D1.8010405@lysator.liu.se> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:11:00 -0000 From: Peter Rosin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [ITP] gcc-tools-autoconf, gcc-tools-automake References: <495FBEB4.7020403@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <49643FA1.209@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <20090107060024.GB25676@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4964AA4C.8090808@byu.net> <87tz894tib.fsf@jondo.cante.net> In-Reply-To: <87tz894tib.fsf@jondo.cante.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00033.txt.bz2 Den 2009-01-08 18:06, skrev Jari Aalto: > Eric Blake writes: > >> According to Christopher Faylor on 1/6/2009 11:00 PM: >> >>> On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 12:37:37AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >>>> Charles Wilson wrote: >>>>> This should make it easier for Dave, and those who want to help him, to >>>>> develop gcc and binutils -- avoiding things like this: >>>>> http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2008-12/msg00201.html >>>> Well, given Dave's positive reaction -- two votes! -- I went ahead and >>>> added these packages to the distro. >>> The number of votes required is five, not two. >> Here's my +1. > > Likewise +1 I want new gcc releases sooner rather than later. +1 -> 5 Cheers, Peter