From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15643 invoked by alias); 31 Aug 2011 18:49:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 15630 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Aug 2011 18:49:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from etr-usa.com (HELO etr-usa.com) (130.94.180.135) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:48:47 +0000 Received: (qmail 50900 invoked by uid 13447); 31 Aug 2011 18:48:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [172.20.0.42]) ([71.33.33.233]) (envelope-sender ) by 130.94.180.135 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 31 Aug 2011 18:48:45 -0000 Message-ID: <4E5E8202.7080004@etr-usa.com> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:49:00 -0000 From: Warren Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: setup.exe opening page graphic References: <4E4AC4C2.5010307@etr-usa.com> <20110817154643.GE27614@calimero.vinschen.de> <4E4D7F19.9000707@etr-usa.com> <20110819153959.GA13266@calimero.vinschen.de> <4E4EE245.1080704@etr-usa.com> <20110820111627.GK13266@calimero.vinschen.de> <4E52A194.10308@etr-usa.com> <20110823141433.GA13527@calimero.vinschen.de> <20110830083138.GA9466@calimero.vinschen.de> <4E5D3F51.1040704@etr-usa.com> <20110831094206.GM30452@calimero.vinschen.de> In-Reply-To: <20110831094206.GM30452@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00240.txt.bz2 On 8/31/2011 3:42 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Aug 30 13:51, Warren Young wrote: >> On 8/30/2011 2:31 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>>> So I'd still love to see a still with a beveled, less glossy C, if >>>> that's ok with you... >>> >>> did you have a chance to look into that? >> >> Still plinking away at it, an hour or so a night, off and on. >> >> It requires completely rebuilding the 3D model. >> >> Don't worry, I'll get you something eventually. > > But that sounds like a lot of work. I really thought that would be > simpler. It's not really difficult. Most of the delay comes from playing, procrastination, and perfectionism. If you're trying to get something released, give me a deadline. That will concentrate my efforts. > Here's the reply from legal: We can use your 2D results from the DAZ > art, as long as you put your resulting work under a free license which > plays nice along the GPL. You don't have to assign copyright to some > other entity like, say, Red Hat. > > GPL or FAL(*) both sound good to me; FAL matches the intent better, I > guess. Lacking any recommendation, I would have gone with some CC variant. I'll look into FAL first now. If it turns out that I still like CC better, I'll check for GPL compatibility. I can already rule out all the "Attribution" variants, for the same reason 4-clause BSD is incompatible, right?