From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10048 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2011 21:15:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 10031 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Sep 2011 21:15:41 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-ww0-f41.google.com) (74.125.82.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 21:15:27 +0000 Received: by wwj26 with SMTP id 26so2485291wwj.2 for ; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 14:15:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.156.65 with SMTP id v1mr1434289wbw.78.1314998125982; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 14:15:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.99] (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com [82.6.108.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fd4sm255212wbb.21.2011.09.02.14.15.22 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 02 Sep 2011 14:15:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E614764.8030202@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 21:15:00 -0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: gcc4: Time to drop gcc3 from the distro? References: <20110902184056.GA11185@calimero.vinschen.de> In-Reply-To: <20110902184056.GA11185@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 On 02/09/2011 19:40, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > As the subject says, shouldn't we remove gcc3 from the distro finally? > We have 3 mingw compilers and gcc4 for Cygwin. What reason is left > to stick to gcc 3? Well, it's the only support we have for Pascal and D. Someone might still be using them. cheers, DaveK