From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21944 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2011 22:22:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 21932 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Sep 2011 22:22:02 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (HELO out2.smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.26) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 22:21:48 +0000 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2542979C for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 18:21:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 25 Sep 2011 18:21:47 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.3] (50-88-210-98.res.bhn.net [50.88.210.98]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 03D60415794; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 18:21:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E7FA96A.20500@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 22:22:00 -0000 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mailing List: CygWin-Apps Subject: Re: New rebase release References: <4E778FC2.2070109@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <20110920152437.GF4836@tishler.net> <4E78B325.9010603@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <20110923151158.GA3616@tishler.net> In-Reply-To: <20110923151158.GA3616@tishler.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg00080.txt.bz2 On 9/23/2011 11:11 AM, Jason Tishler wrote: > I'm about to commit the following patch: > > http://www.tishler.net/jason/software/rebase/rebase.patch > > Any comments before I do so? Looks fine to me. > Additionally, are there any conventions I should following when I tag > the release? "." is not allowed in cvs tags, and they are not allowed to start with a number. So, I usually do this: x.y.z -> vx_y_z 4.0.0 -> v4_0_0 There are other conventions -- and things get more complicated when you want to have branches -- but that will do for now. -- Chuck