From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31264 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2011 12:55:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 31250 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Nov 2011 12:55:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (HELO out2.smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.26) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 12:55:32 +0000 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38D820A96 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 08:55:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 03 Nov 2011 08:55:31 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.3] (50-88-210-98.res.bhn.net [50.88.210.98]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 841E68E0FDE; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 08:55:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4EB28F30.6000808@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 12:55:00 -0000 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mailing List: CygWin-Apps Subject: Re: [ITP] astrometry.net-0.38-1 References: <4E8C7F4E.3080002@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <4E94181D.1090600@gmail.com> <4E9DEBC6.5050504@cornell.edu> <20111103120238.GB12413@calimero.vinschen.de> In-Reply-To: <20111103120238.GB12413@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 On 11/3/2011 8:02 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > I hoped that somebody who voted on the package would do the final > GTG, but in vain it seems. Sorry...I had intended to, but got swamped with other stuff. :-( > Anyway, I just had a look. The packaging now looks basically good. One > issue I still have with the package is the big number of non-standard > binaries in /usr/bin. > > Is it really necessary to have all the binaries as user-accessible > binaries in /usr/bin? Or are many of the binaries just called from > another (or other) binaries which serve as the primary UI? What also > bugs me are the generic names of the binaries. Plotstuff, merge-index, > tablist, tabsort, checktree, ... This all sounds not much like > astronomer stuff. > So, I would prefer to split the binaries into two groups: > > - UI binary (or binaries) into /usr/bin > > - Helper binaries into /usr/share/astrometry/bin FHS says that architecture-dependent files should go under /usr/lib/ not /usr/share...so /usr/lib/astrometry/bin -- Chuck