From: Ken Brown <kbrown@cornell.edu>
To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [ITP] astrometry.net-0.38-1
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 12:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EB9241B.7070803@cornell.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111108071940.GB13401@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
On 11/8/2011 2:19 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Cygwin is supposed to be like a Linux distro. Including packages which
> come with Linux distros is a no-brainer. Including a large, specialized
> package which is not commonly found on Linux and which has a small user
> base is not a no-brainer.
[...]
> Given the fact that the votes needed to trickle in over the course of
> more than a month, it seems that most people don't feel very strongly
> about including this package. I understand that the OP wants to have a
> convenient way of distributing it to the small number of people who need
> it but I don't think that is necessarily a good enough reason for the
> package to occupy disk space and bandwidth on sourceware.org and
> mirrors, for potential package support to show up in the cygwin mailing
> list, and for someone to take time to upload updates to sourceware.org.
>
> I was wondering if anyone else felt like I did about this package. If
> it hadn't required many weeks to get approval + more weeks to get
> packaging worked out, it would have gone in without comment from me.
> Since it did drag on and required multiple pleading messages to keep
> things moving, it certainly seems like there isn't a lot of enthusiasm
> for getting this in.
>
> The bottom line is that I was trying to ask why people voted +1. If it
> was just to "help the guy out" then that's not a really good reason for
> the package to be in the distro. If it was because people thought this
> was "kinda cool..." then that would imply that there was more thought
> involved.
I was the last person to vote +1, and I have to admit that it was mostly
to help the guy out. I regret that I didn't give it more thought. Now
that I've seen this discussion, I am no longer in favor of including the
package in the distro. I think it would make more sense for the OP to
set up his own repository.
Ken
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-08 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-04 8:02 Jussi Kantola
2011-10-04 9:29 ` Corinna Vinschen
2011-10-05 8:43 ` Peter Li
2011-10-05 10:04 ` Jussi Kantola
2011-10-05 16:02 ` Charles Wilson
2011-10-11 10:19 ` Marco Atzeri
2011-10-18 11:21 ` Jussi Kantola
2011-10-18 11:49 ` Chris Sutcliffe
2011-10-18 21:12 ` Ken Brown
2011-10-20 8:19 ` Jussi Kantola
2011-10-30 21:10 ` Jussi Kantola
2011-11-03 12:03 ` Corinna Vinschen
2011-11-03 12:55 ` Charles Wilson
2011-11-03 13:03 ` Corinna Vinschen
2011-11-04 0:52 ` Jussi Kantola
2011-10-05 16:19 ` Andrew Schulman
2011-10-06 13:06 ` Jussi Kantola
2011-10-07 14:20 ` Marco Atzeri
2011-10-07 16:19 ` Jussi Kantola
2011-10-07 16:20 ` Jussi Kantola
2011-10-10 18:54 ` Jussi Kantola
2011-10-10 23:14 ` Christopher Faylor
2011-11-04 6:30 ` Charles Wilson
2011-11-04 9:02 ` Jussi Kantola
2011-11-04 15:12 ` Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
2011-11-04 16:08 ` Charles Wilson
2011-11-04 21:13 ` Charles Wilson
2011-11-07 13:18 ` Jussi Kantola
2011-11-07 14:46 ` Charles Wilson
2011-11-07 16:13 ` Jussi Kantola
2011-11-07 16:18 ` Christopher Faylor
2011-11-08 4:50 ` Charles Wilson
2011-11-08 7:19 ` Christopher Faylor
2011-11-08 12:44 ` Ken Brown [this message]
2011-11-09 2:43 ` Chris Sutcliffe
2011-11-09 10:00 ` Jussi Kantola
2011-11-09 23:24 ` Charles Wilson
2011-11-11 10:46 ` Jussi Kantola
2011-11-11 10:53 ` Jussi Kantola
2011-11-13 17:35 ` Jussi Kantola
2011-11-08 18:01 ` Marco Atzeri
2011-11-08 19:55 ` Christopher Faylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EB9241B.7070803@cornell.edu \
--to=kbrown@cornell.edu \
--cc=cygwin-apps@cygwin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).