From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sa-prd-fep-044.btinternet.com (mailomta8-sa.btinternet.com [213.120.69.14]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D50603858D32 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 19:41:38 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org D50603858D32 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dronecode.org.uk Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dronecode.org.uk Received: from sa-prd-rgout-005.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net ([10.2.38.8]) by sa-prd-fep-044.btinternet.com with ESMTP id <20221201194137.MKET23588.sa-prd-fep-044.btinternet.com@sa-prd-rgout-005.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net>; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 19:41:37 +0000 Authentication-Results: btinternet.com; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=jonturney@btinternet.com; bimi=skipped X-SNCR-Rigid: 6139452E460E0091 X-Originating-IP: [81.153.98.246] X-OWM-Source-IP: 81.153.98.246 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: jonturney@btinternet.com X-VadeSecure-score: verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrtdehgdduvdelucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuueftkffvkffujffvgffngfevqffopdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddunecunecujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvfhfhjggtgfesthekredttdefjeenucfhrhhomheplfhonhcuvfhurhhnvgihuceojhhonhdrthhurhhnvgihsegurhhonhgvtghouggvrdhorhhgrdhukheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepfeevgffghfdtvdetvddvfeduhedukeettdekveeflefgkeekieefgfehhfffudetnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhenucfkphepkedurdduheefrdelkedrvdegieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopegludelvddrudeikedruddruddtiegnpdhinhgvthepkedurdduheefrdelkedrvdegiedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjohhnrdhtuhhrnhgvhiesughrohhnvggtohguvgdrohhrghdruhhkpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedvpdhrtghpthhtoheprggtvgesshgviihnrghmrdgtiidprhgtphhtthhopegthihgfihinhdqrghpphhssegthihgfihinhdrtghomh X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean Received: from [192.168.1.106] (81.153.98.246) by sa-prd-rgout-005.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net (5.8.716.04) (authenticated as jonturney@btinternet.com) id 6139452E460E0091; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 19:41:37 +0000 Message-ID: <4c729833-8293-48d4-1b6d-d9f58e4d5137@dronecode.org.uk> Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 19:41:37 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0 Subject: Re: How does a package become orphaned? (was Re: Attn maintainer: python-paramiko) Content-Language: en-GB To: "cygwin-apps@cygwin.com" , Libor Ukropec References: <3fdca14d-95fa-0398-46a9-6d5291ceae96@gmail.com> <0282d084-b2b2-132f-1e82-4159a4d1de05@gmail.com> <36a5d2b5-41f7-52a4-c95f-d9f2e4f12e96@dronecode.org.uk> From: Jon Turney In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1192.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_SPF_HELO,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 17/11/2022 10:24, Libor Ukropec wrote: > Dne 16.11.2022 v 12:52 Thomas Wolff napsal(a): >> >>> What I do not want to do is the violent take over, so I gave some >>> time to the original owner of the python-paramiko to respond. I >>> created a bug on  github.com almost 2 weeks ago and so far no >>> reaction: https://github.com/wildmichael/cygwin/issues/1 >> As a general comment, I'd like to point out that "almost 2 weeks" is >> even less than someone's holiday time may be... > > See above in the thread - author did not react here on cygwin for > months. What I did, I've found the author on GitHub and contacted him > there as well. > > >>Jon Turney: It's undefined how many times we should ping, or how long > we should wait for a response, but I think that the ~10 months that's > elapsed here is more than enough! Yeah, 10 months is not 2 weeks. Libor, I've given you maintainer-ship of python-paramiko. If that's not what the desired outcome here, please let me know. Sorry for taking so long over this. I guess somebody should ping Michael Wild to ask about the rest of his packages. >>> the cygport is executing in "src_test" some python tests that in the >>> end requires some python packages not available as cygwin packages >>> (typing_extensions, mock, pytest-mock, may be others). >>> >>> So should I >>> a) remove the test? (this is not my preference) >>> or >>> b) specify/execute in the cygport `pip3 install pkg1 pkg2 ...` - I'd >>> expect that executing any stuff in the cygport is not allowed (and I >>> do not want to trigger 'misuse alarm') > > Any advice to this? I think BUILD_REQUIRES should include any src_test requirements. I'll try to document that more clearly. >>> and additional question - how do I execute scallywag "before" the ITA >>> is approved and git repo created? Can/should I use 'playground' >>> branch for another package that I already maintain? >>> >>> I do not see guide on cygwin.com is explaining this. > and this? You can always use the 'playground' repository for any tests or experiments.