From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13837 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2012 19:35:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 13776 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Oct 2012 19:35:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from etr-usa.com (HELO etr-usa.com) (130.94.180.135) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 19:35:14 +0000 Received: (qmail 9643 invoked by uid 13447); 10 Oct 2012 19:35:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [172.20.0.42]) ([71.210.205.172]) (envelope-sender ) by 130.94.180.135 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 10 Oct 2012 19:35:14 -0000 Message-ID: <5075CDF0.5050303@etr-usa.com> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 19:35:00 -0000 From: Warren Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: upload protocol References: <20121009165836.GA11886@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <50754087.5020600@etr-usa.com> <5075B493.2050401@tiscali.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <5075B493.2050401@tiscali.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00128.txt.bz2 On 10/10/2012 11:46 AM, David Stacey wrote: > > As a newbie, I didn't know whether to wait for more comments, or to > submit a [RFU] (as I'd been given a GTG) All of the discussion was questions of whether, not how or why. So, I think you should have just made the changes you wanted to make, and RFU'd the result. There was pretty much no way you could have lost the GTG status. But whatever, it all came out okay.