On 2/21/2013 21:42, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 21 21:33, JonY wrote:
>> On 2/21/2013 20:40, NightStrike wrote:
>>>> I've started looking at the patches, they definitely aren't trivial.
>>>> I'll probably be releasing it as experimental.
>>>
>>> There are local cygwin patches to gcc?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, about 100KB of it. I confess I don't know what most of is for, my
>> understanding of the gcc internals are limited.
> 
> I assume some (or all) of them are already upstream, but they were not
> backported into the 4.5.x branch.  It might be a good idea to start out
> with a clean upstream build and then look into the patches if they still
> make some sense.
> 

OK, will do.