On 2/24/2013 12:55, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:01:56AM +0800, JonY wrote:
>> On 2/24/2013 09:39, Ken Brown wrote:
>>
>>> But isn't all this irrelevant for you?  There's no reason to keep gcc3
>>> around anymore, is there?
>>
>> I don't know, I'll leave that to the core Cygwin devs to decide.
> 
> I'd be happy to get rid of it but don't people still use it?  We can't
> have the gcc4 package overwriting someone's gcc3 if so.
> 

OK.

Anyway, packaging is taking longer than expected, still working on
packaging bugs.

I'm thinking of releasing a test version without Java, not all the
patches have been integrated yet.