From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23905 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2013 07:32:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 23887 invoked by uid 89); 14 Jul 2013 07:32:03 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Unknown (HELO mail-pd0-f178.google.com) (209.85.192.178) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 07:32:02 +0000 Received: by mail-pd0-f178.google.com with SMTP id w11so9716577pde.23 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 00:31:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.68.111.129 with SMTP id ii1mr834680pbb.95.1373787115411; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 00:31:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.101] (S0106000cf16f58b1.wp.shawcable.net. [24.79.212.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v20sm57581762paj.4.2013.07.14.00.31.52 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 14 Jul 2013 00:31:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51E253E5.8050802@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 07:32:00 -0000 From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: remaining missing packages in 64-bit release References: <20130713190538.GA5280@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20130714023820.GA5371@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <51E239B2.8080006@users.sourceforge.net> <51E2442A.7080008@tiscali.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <51E2442A.7080008@tiscali.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00155.txt.bz2 On 2013-07-14 01:24, David Stacey wrote: > On 14/07/13 06:40, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >> On 2013-07-13 21:38, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 09:44:40PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: >>>> There are of course other packages that could be called missing because >>>> they haven't been ported to x86_64 yet, and other packages that >>>> depend on >>>> them can't be released until they are. >>> >>> Ah, good point. I'll check tomorrow and make a more comprehensive list. >> >> Attached. > > This list might not be complete - for instance 'clang' (and its > sub-packages) are missing from 64-bit Cygwin, and they are also not in > Yaakov's list. (I tried generating my own list, but my simple bash > script didn't knock out obsolete packages and hence generated a lot of > noise). My list is based on source packages only, not binary (sub)packages, so clang (which is a subpackage of llvm) is not listed. Yaakov