Re: remaining missing packages in 64-bit release

[David Stacey <drstacey@tiscali.co.uk>]

On 14/07/13 08:31, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On 2013-07-14 01:24, David Stacey wrote:
>> On 14/07/13 06:40, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>>> On 2013-07-13 21:38, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 09:44:40PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote:
>>>>> There are of course other packages that could be called missing 
>>>>> because
>>>>> they haven't been ported to x86_64 yet, and other packages that
>>>>> depend on
>>>>> them can't be released until they are.
>>>>
>>>> Ah, good point.  I'll check tomorrow and make a more comprehensive 
>>>> list.
>>>
>>> Attached.
>>
>> This list might not be complete - for instance 'clang' (and its
>> sub-packages) are missing from 64-bit Cygwin, and they are also not in
>> Yaakov's list. (I tried generating my own list, but my simple bash
>> script didn't knock out obsolete packages and hence generated a lot of
>> noise).
>
> My list is based on source packages only, not binary (sub)packages, so 
> clang (which is a subpackage of llvm) is not listed.
>

Ah - hadn't spotted that. I was temporarily giddy with excitement when I 
thought that clang had made its way into 64-bit Cygwin, only to have my 
hopes dashed moments later... :-)

Cheers,

Dave.