public inbox for cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz@users.sourceforge.net>
To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
Subject: [RFC] cygport: arch-specific workdir (was: cygport cross compilation)
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 18:50:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <533472F3.6000504@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5329DC45.7070806@users.sourceforge.net>

On 2014-03-19 13:04, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On 2014-03-19 11:32, Ken Brown wrote:
>> I've just started experimenting with using cygport for cross compiling,
>> and I've come across two issues:
>>
>> 1. This is just a request: The latest cygport for Fedora appends i686 or
>> x86_64 to the name of the working directory.  I would find it convenient
>> if cygport did the same thing on Cygwin, at least if the --32 or --64
>> option is specified.
>
> Actually, that is experimental code (based on a request from another
> cygport user) that was accidentally shipped when I had to reroll the
> source tarball for compatibility with F20/UnversionedDocDirs.  Would
> people like to see this done always, never, or only when cross-building?

There hasn't been much comment on this.  Since it would be a visible 
change for package maintainers, I would appreciate more of a consensus. 
  Are there any objections to making the workdir always arch-specific 
(IOW name-ver-rel.arch)?


Yaakov

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-03-27 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-19 16:32 cygport cross compilation Ken Brown
2014-03-19 18:05 ` Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
2014-03-19 18:28   ` Corinna Vinschen
2014-03-19 18:39     ` Ken Brown
2014-03-19 18:50   ` Ken Brown
2014-03-27 18:50   ` Yaakov (Cygwin/X) [this message]
2014-03-27 20:01     ` [RFC] cygport: arch-specific workdir Achim Gratz
2014-03-27 21:02       ` Ken Brown
2014-03-27 23:47     ` David Stacey
2014-03-28 17:20     ` David Rothenberger
2014-04-27 20:22     ` Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
2014-05-04 16:41       ` Achim Gratz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=533472F3.6000504@users.sourceforge.net \
    --to=yselkowitz@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=cygwin-apps@cygwin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).