From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12495 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2014 15:37:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 12484 invoked by uid 89); 6 Apr 2014 15:37:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_COUK,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: out.ipsmtp2nec.opaltelecom.net Received: from out.ipsmtp2nec.opaltelecom.net (HELO out.ipsmtp2nec.opaltelecom.net) (62.24.202.74) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 06 Apr 2014 15:37:52 +0000 X-SMTPAUTH: drstacey@tiscali.co.uk X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAC10QVNPRttS/2dsb2JhbAANTINBxGmBK4MZAQEBBDhAEQsYCRYPCQMCAQIBRRMIAQGIAqhLowUTBI54FoQiBK5L X-IPAS-Result: ApMBAC10QVNPRttS/2dsb2JhbAANTINBxGmBK4MZAQEBBDhAEQsYCRYPCQMCAQIBRRMIAQGIAqhLowUTBI54FoQiBK5L Received: from 79-70-219-82.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO [192.168.1.5]) ([79.70.219.82]) by out.ipsmtp2nec.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 06 Apr 2014 16:37:45 +0100 Message-ID: <534174C4.5010608@tiscali.co.uk> Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 15:37:00 -0000 From: David Stacey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: 64-bit: Missing perl modules References: <534078A2.4000601@tiscali.co.uk> <87bnwf2cjl.fsf@Rainer.invalid> In-Reply-To: <87bnwf2cjl.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 On 06/04/14 07:32, Achim Gratz wrote: > David Stacey writes: >> Reini: I am aware that you maintain these modules in the 32-bit >> distribution through the 'perl_vendor' package. I don't want to tread >> on any toes, and I don't know what plans you have for >> 'perl_vendor'. > You might want to check the archives for an earlier discussion about > perl_vendor. > > https://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin-apps/2012-08/msg00006.html Thank you for your reply. Yes, I was aware of that discussion. I'm not talking about breaking up 'perl_vendor' for 32-bit Cygwin (although IMHO that would be a good thing in the long term). I'd just like to see the perl modules I mentioned adding to 64-bit Cygwin - and I'm happy to maintain those packages myself if no-one else want to claim ownership. Dave.