From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23351 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2014 16:20:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 23338 invoked by uid 89); 8 Apr 2014 16:20:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_COUK,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: out.ipsmtp1nec.opaltelecom.net Received: from out.ipsmtp1nec.opaltelecom.net (HELO out.ipsmtp1nec.opaltelecom.net) (62.24.202.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 16:20:13 +0000 X-SMTPAUTH: drstacey@tiscali.co.uk X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBANQgRFNV0kJ3/2dsb2JhbAANTMUygw6BNYMZAQEBBDhRCxgJJQ8CRhMIAQGvIKJjF45zFoQiBK5O X-IPAS-Result: ApMBANQgRFNV0kJ3/2dsb2JhbAANTMUygw6BNYMZAQEBBDhRCxgJJQ8CRhMIAQGvIKJjF45zFoQiBK5O Received: from 85-210-66-119.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO [192.168.1.5]) ([85.210.66.119]) by out.ipsmtp1nec.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 08 Apr 2014 17:20:09 +0100 Message-ID: <534421B5.10901@tiscali.co.uk> Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 16:20:00 -0000 From: David Stacey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: 64-bit: Missing perl modules References: <534078A2.4000601@tiscali.co.uk> <87bnwf2cjl.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <534174C4.5010608@tiscali.co.uk> <87y4zi1kib.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <5341A3F5.2040506@tiscali.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2 On 07/04/14 19:54, Reini Urban wrote: > The new 5.18.2 package will be unified for 32bit and 64bit, yes. > > perl_vendor will probably stay as is, as it is the easiest for the > user and the maintainer. Thank you for your reply. I'm pleased that there is a way forward to get these perl modules into 64-bit Cygwin, and I look forward to seeing 'perl_vendor' in our 64-bit land. Thanks again, Dave.