From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24427 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2015 17:20:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 24414 invoked by uid 89); 21 Feb 2015 17:20:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: limerock02.mail.cornell.edu Received: from limerock02.mail.cornell.edu (HELO limerock02.mail.cornell.edu) (128.84.13.242) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 17:20:10 +0000 X-CornellRouted: This message has been Routed already. Received: from authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (granite3.serverfarm.cornell.edu [10.16.197.8]) by limerock02.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4_cu) with ESMTP id t1LHK8Hx030486 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 12:20:08 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.4] (cpe-67-249-176-138.twcny.res.rr.com [67.249.176.138]) (authenticated bits=0) by authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id t1LHK7t2012390 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 12:20:08 -0500 Message-ID: <54E8BE42.2030200@cornell.edu> Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 17:20:00 -0000 From: Ken Brown User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: ffcall References: <54E4DEC2.2060400@cornell.edu> <1424287689.3460.19.camel@cygwin.com> <20150218200825.GB22849@calimero.vinschen.de> <54E51500.8070200@cornell.edu> <20150219093852.GA4783@calimero.vinschen.de> <54E6048C.6060605@x-ray.at> <54E61348.9080104@cornell.edu> <54E61B05.2050109@cornell.edu> <54E63D93.7070000@x-ray.at> <54E7FF3A.30609@cornell.edu> <54E8812D.9050601@x-ray.at> In-Reply-To: <54E8812D.9050601@x-ray.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00276.txt.bz2 On 2/21/2015 7:59 AM, Reini Urban wrote: > On 02/21/2015 04:44 AM, Ken Brown wrote: >> On 2/19/2015 2:46 PM, Reini Urban wrote: >>> And the deal with the latest clisp 2.49 was that modules can be >>> dynaloaded. >>> If the gnulib steps would work. I never did for me. And I fixed most of >>> the other >>> module compilation problems before. >> >> But I just discovered that clisp-2.49 builds fine with the configure >> option --without-dynamic-modules. Is there any reason not to do >> that? After all, clisp-2.48 is built without dynamic modules, so >> what's the harm in doing the same for 2.49? > > Technically this is the best. > But I never published 2.49 with this option, because there were not many > other changes. > So it's almost the same as 2.48 and my version was not as confusing. OK, that makes sense. On the other hand, I think users are confused by not having the latest release in the distro, so I'll probably update to 2.49. Ken