From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 60409 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2015 20:40:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 60397 invoked by uid 89); 14 Jul 2015 20:40:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-wi0-f176.google.com Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f176.google.com) (209.85.212.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 20:40:57 +0000 Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so64895294wib.1 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 13:40:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.86.234 with SMTP id s10mr8914898wiz.50.1436906454815; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 13:40:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.108] (pD9E6149B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.230.20.155]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id z9sm22803006wiv.9.2015.07.14.13.40.53 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Jul 2015 13:40:53 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Perl 5.22.0 To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <87wpznjioa.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <873826zpxi.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87380qtt5j.fsf@Rainer.invalid> From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: <55A573CB.1040100@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 20:40:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87380qtt5j.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00059.txt.bz2 On 7/14/2015 9:51 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: > Achim Gratz writes: > > There are a few Perl distribution packages that are captive in another > source package. The hopefully complete list of such packages: > > perl-Graphics-Magick > perl-gv > perl-Image-Magick > perl-ming > perl-Net-Libproxy > perl-Xfce4-Xfconf > perl-zinnia > > This means that again Yaakov as well as Marco and Volker need to > re-release those. Yaakov has volunteered to update Volker's packages > while he's away, I hope the offer still stands. perl-Graphics-Magick perl-Image-Magick are already available as test > These packages place module files into vendor_perl while the package > name has nothing to do with Perl (not all of them are available for both > architectures): > > amanda > biber > git-svn > git > irssi > net-snmp-perl > po4a > pristine-tar > sendxmpp > subversion-perl > > And lastly, two packages put files in site_perl which should not happen > for official packages, so that should be corrected anyway: > > grepmail > stow > > The last two sets of packages involve Mark O'Keefe, > Ken Brown, Adam Dinwoodie, Marco, David Rothenberger, Jari Aalto, Andrew > Schulman and Yaakov again. > > > Since the move of all packages into the release should happen at the > same time, I think we need to do something slightly different this time > around: I propose that instead of posting a !ready cookie a !perl cookie > is used instead (I hopa that would not create problems with upset). > Then a maintainer with full ssh access can flip those cookies over to > !ready between two scans so that all packages get moved at the same > time. Would that work for everybody? I will prefer to upload as test any perl 5.22 package. Updating the setup.hint will immediately move all the packages at the same time. > > > Regards, > Achim. >