From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 93309 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2015 09:08:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 93293 invoked by uid 89); 22 Jul 2015 09:08:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-wi0-f174.google.com Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f174.google.com) (209.85.212.174) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:08:23 +0000 Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so144848115wib.1 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 02:08:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.83.70 with SMTP id o6mr3030490wjy.44.1437556100204; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 02:08:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.108] (pD9E6149B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.230.20.155]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id gw7sm20958775wib.15.2015.07.22.02.08.18 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Jul 2015 02:08:19 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: missing 64bit ports To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com, "Pierre A. Humblet" References: <55A66D0B.7030603@gmail.com> <55AD3B1B.3050209@dronecode.org.uk> From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: <55AF5D7C.7060707@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:08:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55AD3B1B.3050209@dronecode.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00164.txt.bz2 On 7/20/2015 8:16 PM, Jon TURNEY wrote: > On 15/07/2015 15:24, Marco Atzeri wrote: >> I spent a bit of time checking the real situation of the packages >> still missing as 64 bit port. >> After xdelta, bsdiff and iperf porting, without counting the few mingw >> ones, the duplicates we are down to ~44. >> >> Please see here the analysis : >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Hn7Eaq6djEN9X0jS_AM8-DH_LvP43G9_DXnpTt09Asc/edit#gid=0 >> > > I have built a 64-bit dmalloc for my personal use, so I can ITA if > Pierre is no longer interested in maintaining dmalloc. > > The last upstream release was in 2007, so it can probably be classified > as 'mature' :D > Pierre, any feedback ? (assuming you are not in Vacation) Regards Marco