From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 74898 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2016 16:02:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 74843 invoked by uid 89); 18 Feb 2016 16:02:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:cygwin X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:02:26 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ABFA51D for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:02:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.10.116.17] (ovpn-116-17.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.116.17]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u1IG2Nrp013439 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:02:24 -0500 Subject: Re: googlecl To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <56C5E539.70700@cygwin.com> From: Yaakov Selkowitz Message-ID: <56C5EB12.8040109@cygwin.com> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:02:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg00057.txt.bz2 On 2016-02-18 09:54, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > On 18 February 2016 at 10:37, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> On 2016-02-18 09:11, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >>> I haven't tested the existing googlecl package to see if it still >>> works, but I suspect it doesn't given the statement above. Should it >>> be removed from the distro? >> >> If it doesn't work anymore, then it should be removed. > > I've confirmed that googlecl in the distro no longer works, so it > should be removed. Done. -- Yaakov