From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 82406 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2016 22:02:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 82393 invoked by uid 89); 17 Mar 2016 22:02:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:cygwin, H*F:U*yselkowitz, sk:libmysq, x64 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 22:02:45 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BACE06438E for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 22:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.10.116.22] (ovpn-116-22.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.116.22]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u2HM2gah014897 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:02:44 -0400 Subject: Re: crypt mismatch To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <20160218231017.42741.qmail@sourceware.org> <56C65601.2030702@gmail.com> <20160219115513.GB8295@calimero.vinschen.de> From: Yaakov Selkowitz Message-ID: <56EB2985.4010506@cygwin.com> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 22:02:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160219115513.GB8295@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-03/txt/msg00067.txt.bz2 On 2016-02-19 05:55, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Feb 19 00:38, Marco Atzeri wrote: > That's ok. Crypt 1.2-1 for 32 bit is older than crypt 1.1-1 for 64 bit. Oops, that's probably my fault from during the 64-bit bootstrap, because crypt.README says "This is the DES-crypt package Version 1.1". > I could create a new 1.3-1 for both but... meh. Actually, could we have a 1.2-2 split as on x64? The upcoming mariadb-based libmysqlclient-devel will need a manual libcrypt-devel dependency and it would be easier to not make that arch-specific. -- Yaakov