From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7722 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2016 19:55:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 7706 invoked by uid 89); 11 Apr 2016 19:55:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*MI:cygwin, H*M:cygwin, H*Ad:U*yselkowitz X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 19:55:24 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B4AE811A2 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 19:55:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.10.116.24] (ovpn-116-24.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.116.24]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u3BJtMoC023344 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 15:55:23 -0400 To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com From: Yaakov Selkowitz Subject: gcc: rebuild for cygwin 2.5.0 Message-ID: <570C011A.2060301@cygwin.com> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 19:55:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-04/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 JonY, Cygwin 2.5.0 contains a number of features which will benefit g++ once it is rebuilt. I have posted an updated patchset here: https://github.com/cygwinports/gcc Please let me know if you have any questions regarding these changes. -- Yaakov