From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 105249 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2016 19:43:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 105239 invoked by uid 89); 29 Apr 2016 19:43:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*F:U*mark, H*RU:!192.168.1.100!, Hx-spam-relays-external:!192.168.1.100!, complaints X-HELO: m0.truegem.net Received: from m0.truegem.net (HELO m0.truegem.net) (69.55.228.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 19:43:37 +0000 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by m0.truegem.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) id u3TJhZmd050173 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:43:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@maxrnd.com) Received: from 76-217-5-154.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net(76.217.5.154), claiming to be "[192.168.1.100]" via SMTP by m0.truegem.net, id smtpduYle3Y; Fri Apr 29 12:43:32 2016 Subject: Re: unison-2.48 build fails with latest ocaml and flexdll (ping: Yaakov, Damien) To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <18002c59-1b77-5912-f5fa-c3e39540b8d8@gmail.com> <41t6ibtbcojbmar8blrc80fk8tmplbbuj3@4ax.com> <5723B6C7.8090100@maxrnd.com> From: Mark Geisert Message-ID: <5723B981.6070807@maxrnd.com> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 19:43:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/42.0 SeaMonkey/2.39 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5723B6C7.8090100@maxrnd.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-04/txt/msg00048.txt.bz2 Mark Geisert wrote: > the relocation error is different in a 5.3.0 object than a 4.9.2 object such as ^^^^^ 4.8.2 > So for your case I'd first try rebasing flexdll.so down to 0x0000eff30000 (you > may collide with something else so pay attention to rebase complaints and try a > different address if necessary). If that doesn't help then try rebuilding > flexdll.so with gcc 5.3.0 if it is currently being built with an older gcc. Mis-stated the 2nd incantation. Try rebuilding the thing that's linking against flexdll.so with gcc 5.3.0. ..mark