From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28645 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 2016 08:03:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 28625 invoked by uid 89); 8 Sep 2016 08:03:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*Ad:U*mark, H*r:8.12.11, respond X-HELO: m0.truegem.net Received: from m0.truegem.net (HELO m0.truegem.net) (69.55.228.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Sep 2016 08:03:16 +0000 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by m0.truegem.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) id u8883E70071667 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 01:03:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@maxrnd.com) Received: from 76-217-5-154.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net(76.217.5.154), claiming to be "[192.168.1.100]" via SMTP by m0.truegem.net, id smtpdHxwl2h; Thu Sep 8 01:03:05 2016 Subject: cygfuse (was Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8) To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <579A4102.9040406@maxrnd.com> <20160728200435.GG26311@calimero.vinschen.de> <20160729085141.GK26311@calimero.vinschen.de> <20160817091433.zksukafls6mkk52u@calimero.vinschen.de> <57CD3C7A.1000902@maxrnd.com> <57CF3E21.3060901@maxrnd.com> From: Mark Geisert Message-ID: <57D11B39.2010108@maxrnd.com> Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 08:03:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/43.0 SeaMonkey/2.40 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <57CF3E21.3060901@maxrnd.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-09/txt/msg00012.txt.bz2 Mark Geisert wrote: [... some stuff ...] I've changed Subject: to reflect what's being discussed now. When we have a consensus cygfuse I'll issue an ITP for it. I've now updated the cygfuse repository on GitHub so it is more neutral about FUSE implementations. It can be seen at https://github.com/mgeisert/cygfuse . I've also read up a little on Dokan and Dokany, so I should be able to better respond to any comments Adrien might have about the updated cygfuse. Thanks all, ..mark