From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 95951 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2016 21:14:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 95940 invoked by uid 89); 6 Jun 2016 21:14:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_COUK,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=government, u.s, US, UD:U.S X-HELO: smtp-out-4.tiscali.co.uk Received: from smtp-out-4.tiscali.co.uk (HELO smtp-out-4.tiscali.co.uk) (62.24.135.132) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 21:14:11 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([79.68.204.134]) by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP id A1qVbpmV9ARaBA1qabq97N; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 22:14:08 +0100 Subject: Re: gcovr - Suitable for Cygwin? To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <20160606084958.GE14744@calimero.vinschen.de> <20160606191840.GH4919@calimero.vinschen.de> From: David Stacey Message-ID: <5c5bdf30-6aca-ac9c-aad4-8cdde0cbb62a@tiscali.co.uk> Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 21:14:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160606191840.GH4919@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfOvP631lv5UgIK+GmYG1hVvcj9Yf4S4/D7dKMjecjRMGxSmR0ZQmIPT7Y1TPgQHc5MdXllMcj41m8x6ur7Dmkxw8sEJh+PACr4mvcJhK0WeEPywgYsn6 BGsS6cYcTAhW2PO4nGpnWfLYuMbYqkPw0WzxfzwQj9Hzvr/ZLYWKNg9bxE6cS7yPuf0C1p3JpLxlGw== X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-06/txt/msg00012.txt.bz2 On 06/06/16 20:18, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jun 6 10:49, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Jun 4 19:10, David Stacey wrote: >>> I've been using gcovr to generate coverage reports, and I'd be happy to >>> maintain this for Cygwin. Before submitting a package, I'd be grateful if >>> someone could check the licence [1]. >>> >>> It's a fairly standard 3-clause BSD affair, but with the caveat that 'the >>> U.S. Government retains certain rights in this software.' It isn't clear (to >>> me, at least) what rights are being referred to. Would such a clause >>> prohibit its inclusion in Cygwin? >>> >>> Note that gcovr isn't available for Fedora or CentOS, although this could be >>> because it hasn't been packaged for these distros, rather than any >>> incompatibility in the licence. It is, however, available for Debian and >>> Ubuntu [2]. >>> >>> Any thoughts on its suitability for Cygwin? >> Let me ask somebody who knows this better than me... > Ok, nothing to worry about. Please go ahead if you like. Thank you for checking. I'll prepare a package later this week. Dave.