From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from re-prd-fep-049.btinternet.com (mailomta32-re.btinternet.com [213.120.69.125]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 735EA3857C45 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 21:01:24 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 735EA3857C45 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dronecode.org.uk Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk Received: from re-prd-rgout-004.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net ([10.2.54.7]) by re-prd-fep-049.btinternet.com with ESMTP id <20200823210123.WNGN4131.re-prd-fep-049.btinternet.com@re-prd-rgout-004.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net> for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 22:01:23 +0100 Authentication-Results: btinternet.com; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=jonturney@btinternet.com X-Originating-IP: [31.51.206.39] X-OWM-Source-IP: 31.51.206.39 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: jonturney@btinternet.com X-VadeSecure-score: verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudduiedgudegkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemuceutffkvffkuffjvffgnffgvefqofdpqfgfvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucenucfjughrpefhuffvfhfkffgfgggjtgfgsehtjeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpeflohhnucfvuhhrnhgvhicuoehjohhnrdhtuhhrnhgvhiesughrohhnvggtohguvgdrohhrghdruhhkqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeghfegfedvheelgeffhfdtfeehgfethedvhfeghefgjeeljedtgeejvedttefgleenucffohhmrghinheptgihghifihhnrdgtohhmnecukfhppeefuddrhedurddvtdeirdefleenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopegludelvddrudeikedruddrudduudgnpdhinhgvthepfedurdehuddrvddtiedrfeelpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepoehjohhnrdhtuhhrnhgvhiesughrohhnvggtohguvgdrohhrghdruhhkqecuuefqffgjpeekuefkvffokffogfdprhgtphhtthhopeeotgihghifihhnqdgrphhpshestgihghifihhnrdgtohhmqe X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean Received: from [192.168.1.111] (31.51.206.39) by re-prd-rgout-004.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net (5.8.340) (authenticated as jonturney@btinternet.com) id 5ED9C5060D3816DA for cygwin-apps@cygwin.com; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 22:01:23 +0100 From: Jon Turney Subject: Re: git repositories for cygwin packaging - please test To: "cygwin-apps@cygwin.com" References: <20e2f046-af24-14b8-b6c4-263f859042b8@dronecode.org.uk> <181ea3fa-1a50-7db4-0009-47ea9af77cdc@dronecode.org.uk> Message-ID: <5ff5073b-03a7-95e5-6d8b-fbd6436fe1c4@dronecode.org.uk> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 22:01:22 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <181ea3fa-1a50-7db4-0009-47ea9af77cdc@dronecode.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FORGED_SPF_HELO, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cygwin package maintainer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 21:01:25 -0000 On 27/05/2020 23:27, Jon Turney wrote: > On 04/08/2019 21:08, Jon Turney wrote: >> To remedy this lack, using the same ssh key you use for sftp package >> upload, package maintainers can now also push to git repositories, >> like so: > > Package maintainers may have noticed that the output from pushing to > these git repositories now includes a line like: > > "remote: scallywag: build nnn queued" > > This is a *prototype* of a system to automatically build the packages, > where the results appear (some time later) at [1] (URL subject to change) > > [1] https://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/jobs.cgi > > Currently, many packages will fail to build correctly due to: I now have built an (opt-in) system which fetches the packages built by this into your upload area and triggers calm to process them, which I'm looking for a volunteer to test. Currently, these packages are built using 'cygport all-test', and so will always be marked test: One possible issue is that a git commit doesn't have to change VERSION or RELEASE, so this can build packages which are then immediately rejected by calm, as that PVR already exists. I'm not sure if that's a real problem, or what the workflow should look like in regards to that.