From: Ken Brown <kbrown@cornell.edu>
To: Jon Turney <jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk>,
"cygwin-apps@cygwin.com" <cygwin-apps@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: git repositories for cygwin packaging - please test
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 11:22:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65dfe3d7-d968-bede-470d-ce19a427edde@cornell.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a621652d-b497-6a74-031c-40f26567a0b4@dronecode.org.uk>
On 8/30/2020 11:00 AM, Jon Turney wrote:
> On 26/08/2020 23:00, Ken Brown via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>> On 8/23/2020 5:01 PM, Jon Turney wrote:
>>>
>>> I now have built an (opt-in) system which fetches the packages built by this
>>> into your upload area and triggers calm to process them, which I'm looking
>>> for a volunteer to test.
>>
>> I'd be willing to give it a try the next time I have something to upload. I'm
>> actually almost ready for a test release of doxygen. Unfortunately, the 32-bit
>> scallywag build of doxygen consistently fails with an ld crash, even though I
>> can build it locally. So I can't use it for this test.
>>
>> How does the opt-in process work? Is it per package? Is it easy to opt-out
>> again temporarily?
>
> We can arrange the details however you like. A specific package might be a good
> idea for a first try.
OK, I've got a test release of ghostscript ready to go. I've already tested it
on the playground branch, so I know it builds. If I put 'SCALLYWAG=deploy' in
the cygport and push to master, will that do the job?
> Only pushes to master are considered. You can opt-out by adding
> 'SCALLYWAG=nodeploy' to the cygport.
That sounds fine.
>>> Currently, these packages are built using 'cygport all-test', and so will
>>> always be marked test:
>>>
>>> One possible issue is that a git commit doesn't have to change VERSION or
>>> RELEASE, so this can build packages which are then immediately rejected by
>>> calm, as that PVR already exists.
>>
>> Does calm delete them after rejecting them or does the maintainer have to do
>> that?
>
> I've actually recently made a change to calm so that packages rejected as
> duplicates of existing PVR are discarded rather than retained, as this was just
> an inconvenience with no benefit.
Good.
Ken
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-30 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-04 20:08 Jon Turney
2019-08-05 2:03 ` Ken Brown
2019-08-08 13:47 ` Andrew Schulman via cygwin-apps
2019-08-08 14:04 ` Andrew Schulman via cygwin-apps
2019-08-08 17:09 ` Ken Brown
2019-08-09 16:12 ` Jon Turney
2019-08-09 19:12 ` Ken Brown
2019-08-13 11:55 ` Jon Turney
2019-08-09 16:00 ` Jon Turney
2019-08-09 20:58 ` Brian Inglis
2019-08-13 11:55 ` Jon Turney
2019-08-19 18:36 ` Achim Gratz
2020-05-27 22:27 ` Jon Turney
2020-05-28 11:51 ` szgyg
2020-06-04 16:01 ` Ken Brown
2020-06-04 20:33 ` Brian Inglis
2020-06-09 13:26 ` Jon Turney
2020-06-09 22:44 ` Brian Inglis
2020-08-06 20:20 ` Jon Turney
2020-08-06 21:04 ` Ken Brown
2020-08-07 19:42 ` Achim Gratz
2020-08-07 22:05 ` Ken Brown
2020-08-08 4:26 ` ASSI
2020-08-16 18:05 ` Jon Turney
2020-08-23 21:01 ` Jon Turney
2020-08-26 22:00 ` Ken Brown
2020-08-30 15:00 ` Jon Turney
2020-08-30 15:22 ` Ken Brown [this message]
2020-08-30 15:46 ` Jon Turney
2020-08-30 17:25 ` Ken Brown
2020-08-30 20:06 ` Jon Turney
2020-11-12 21:30 ` Jon Turney
2020-08-30 16:44 ` ASSI
2020-08-30 20:08 ` Jon Turney
2020-10-04 10:26 ` Achim Gratz
2020-10-25 18:10 ` Jon Turney
2021-05-09 14:39 ` Jon Turney
2021-06-22 19:52 ` Jon Turney
2021-06-23 4:22 ` Brian Inglis
2022-07-05 13:12 ` Jon Turney
2023-02-18 16:21 ` Jon Turney
2023-02-18 17:43 ` Ken Brown
2023-02-18 18:40 ` Jon Turney
2020-11-16 21:54 ` Brian Inglis
2020-11-16 22:16 ` Jon Turney
2020-11-16 22:54 ` Brian Inglis
2020-11-17 19:21 ` Achim Gratz
2020-05-29 14:40 ` Alexey Sokolov
2020-06-07 15:06 ` Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=65dfe3d7-d968-bede-470d-ce19a427edde@cornell.edu \
--to=kbrown@cornell.edu \
--cc=cygwin-apps@cygwin.com \
--cc=jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).