From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sa-prd-fep-043.btinternet.com (mailomta30-sa.btinternet.com [213.120.69.36]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A53A83858C2C for ; Sun, 2 Oct 2022 20:37:49 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org A53A83858C2C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dronecode.org.uk Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dronecode.org.uk Received: from sa-prd-rgout-001.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net ([10.2.38.4]) by sa-prd-fep-043.btinternet.com with ESMTP id <20221002203748.KKHJ4243.sa-prd-fep-043.btinternet.com@sa-prd-rgout-001.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net>; Sun, 2 Oct 2022 21:37:48 +0100 Authentication-Results: btinternet.com; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=jonturney@btinternet.com; bimi=skipped X-SNCR-Rigid: 62E573CC0A5D98DF X-Originating-IP: [81.153.98.187] X-OWM-Source-IP: 81.153.98.187 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: jonturney@btinternet.com X-VadeSecure-score: verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrfeehjedgudeghecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemuceutffkvffkuffjvffgnffgvefqofdpqfgfvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvfhfhjggtgfesthejredttdefjeenucfhrhhomheplfhonhcuvfhurhhnvgihuceojhhonhdrthhurhhnvgihsegurhhonhgvtghouggvrdhorhhgrdhukheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgfekieetleevhfehvedvfeduieetvddvtdejffduieeggeegffdtudduudejtdefnecuffhomhgrihhnpehsohhurhgtvgifrghrvgdrohhrghdpghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmpdhsphgugidrohhrghenucfkphepkedurdduheefrdelkedrudekjeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopegludelvddrudeikedruddruddtiegnpdhinhgvthepkedurdduheefrdelkedrudekjedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjohhnrdhtuhhrnhgvhiesughrohhnvggtohguvgdrohhrghdruhhkpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedvpdhrtghpthhtohepuehrihgrnhdrkfhnghhlihhssefuhihsthgvmhgrthhitgfufidrrggsrdgtrgdprhgtphhtthhopegthihgfihinhdqrghpphhssegthihgfihinhdrtghomh X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean Received: from [192.168.1.106] (81.153.98.187) by sa-prd-rgout-001.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net (5.8.716.04) (authenticated as jonturney@btinternet.com) id 62E573CC0A5D98DF; Sun, 2 Oct 2022 21:37:48 +0100 Message-ID: <6ad4f959-85d5-65f9-f412-853aeb4df46e@dronecode.org.uk> Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2022 21:37:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.1 Subject: Re: Cygwin Mailing Lists Disabled? Blocking Package Uploads? Content-Language: en-GB To: "cygwin-apps@cygwin.com" , Brian Inglis References: From: Jon Turney In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3569.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_SPF_HELO,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 02/10/2022 19:13, Brian Inglis wrote: > On 2022-10-02 05:20, Jon Turney wrote: >> On 02/10/2022 08:23, Brian Inglis wrote: >>> Also I don't seem to be able to get on to any mailing list interface >>> to re-enable email to perhaps check status via email in public inbox. >> >> I don't understand what this means. > > Email retries are often visible under Sourceware Public Inbox e.g. > > https://inbox.sourceware.org/cygwin-apps/202209252042.28PJfcQU021984-28PKg7eC017324-6W6R+pMrZmcI6pMNW8xKTw@public.gmane.org/T/#u It was unintentional that email bounces were ending up there, and has been fixed. > Any chance of maybe just appending to an mbox cleared after 24 hours old? It would probably just be easier to arrange for upload reports to go to a new mailing list, if we that something that is really wanted... > I keep having to comment out LICENSE after updates to the latest SPDX > keys, as it seems to block uploads! The current situation is that a 'license:' key is not required in the package hint, but if present, it's value must validate. If you're having problems, please give an example of a something you think is a valid SPDX license expression, but isn't accepted. > What are you using to validate licences in calm - PyPi spdx-tools? I'm using license_expression (See https://github.com/nexB/license-expression) > Finally, do you have any advice on what to do about various US Public > Domain sources like tz{code,data} about which SPDX.org is still having > discussions? > I have submitted input asking them to add a tz/tzdb/zoneinfo PD licence > instance, and/or also something for other generic US.gov PD sources, > like they currently have for NIST, CC, Open Data Commons, Sax, and > libselinux. > But they closed an issue from a US.gov entity asking for a generic > US.gov PD licence for their documents! For our purposes, you may use the string 'Public-Domain', in cases where no license applies because the material has been placed in the public domain.