From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18687 invoked by alias); 1 Apr 2017 12:30:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 18668 invoked by uid 89); 1 Apr 2017 12:30:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Safe, obsoleted, symantec, Symantec X-HELO: mail-pf0-f175.google.com Received: from mail-pf0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-pf0-f175.google.com) (209.85.192.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 12:30:17 +0000 Received: by mail-pf0-f175.google.com with SMTP id 197so4422027pfv.1 for ; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 05:30:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2EPuNBwIQKZf8ZyCPijnmjahCfjQcW5+3KX5FyAXhbE=; b=KT90IlaT5EFyNRT/tTajKxhuKNwPfSube8Nz3bV61om0tgFQOdQWd65qJSZ7RtV4Yw JbvkOi/A9vYDaxBAXhvD69k0U1JJQyLPlsQ6VQU+dBJ8Oyg9Mq07O3euiNk53RrXo4I7 3rC92S9zn3YZWHPJ2a9oHtLMOGRHSC3vH8N6+okILLqeRiezkowNg6dbK7c1qPiflG4l 9O+Y7gX+q/eYgK6VQOwuN4/4vO5ooGNaGyK53sVeOU9WoeOpO4haQ3EvdBpUVMInHgzA hNxAFCcoDnPgmDbmTvLzjZHZQMZIov5QVCdaoPaN1271JyoOdPmcgu3eqdAmvGSpYOUW g0TA== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H35URhp2p/mqNzVJ6mxV6OsdWwNfzV6zH94q+dkUGxXbrJw6/OstVAw1PDfOy0EQw== X-Received: by 10.98.192.151 with SMTP id g23mr7348938pfk.254.1491049812255; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 05:30:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.20.3.173] (wsip-66-210-0-98.ph.ph.cox.net. [66.210.0.98]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id z4sm16048812pge.49.2017.04.01.05.30.10 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 01 Apr 2017 05:30:11 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: how to manage 2 guile version To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <4e6e442a-1b34-00c6-4705-0dc1a2b62d26@gmail.com> <359f421b-559c-fc1d-ecea-dbcafd65f4df@gmail.com> <6d3c740a-b478-cf44-6ca2-e69980b859f9@cygwin.com> <46c991b5-ba66-4c9e-204b-ec17a7b76292@gmail.com> <520a87b8-e37d-b350-188a-8af647e6a021@gmail.com> From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: <6c9ae11b-eee0-6a9d-9a8b-76e2d2529276@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 12:30:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-04/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2 On 28/03/2017 18:08, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2017-03-28 11:00, Marco Atzeri wrote: >> On 28/03/2017 17:34, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >>> On 2017-03-28 00:50, Marco Atzeri wrote: >>>> Last week I was planning to just release guile-2.0.14, >>>> but while the test of guile itself is almost fine I noticed an issue >>>> when building "make" with it. >>>> >>>> Only tested on 64 bits, 'make check' of make fails on all guile tests >>> >>> WFM: >> >> Than is the Symantec annoying me again. >> I will check in Safe mode without AV. > > I have updated my proposed changes: > > https://github.com/cygwinports/guile > https://github.com/cygwinports/guile1.8 Hi Yaakov, thanks. The issue for make was in the lack of 2.0.9-module-ldflags.patch. With that "make check" has no issue on guile test. I am making minor change to your proposal for package names; for 2.0 we have libguile2.0-devel so for 1.8 I am using libguile1.8-devel instead of libguile-devel and current guile-devel is obsoleted by libguile2.0-devel. I will upload as soon I complete the build for both arch. Regards Marco