From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from re-prd-fep-045.btinternet.com (mailomta8-re.btinternet.com [213.120.69.101]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A362E3858C52 for ; Sat, 14 May 2022 13:09:50 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org A362E3858C52 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dronecode.org.uk Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dronecode.org.uk Received: from re-prd-rgout-004.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net ([10.2.54.7]) by re-prd-fep-045.btinternet.com with ESMTP id <20220514130949.BCGP3219.re-prd-fep-045.btinternet.com@re-prd-rgout-004.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net>; Sat, 14 May 2022 14:09:49 +0100 Authentication-Results: btinternet.com; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=jonturney@btinternet.com; bimi=skipped X-SNCR-Rigid: 613A901C23419F73 X-Originating-IP: [86.139.167.41] X-OWM-Source-IP: 86.139.167.41 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: jonturney@btinternet.com X-VadeSecure-score: verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrhedugdeitdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemuceutffkvffkuffjvffgnffgvefqofdpqfgfvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvfhfhjggtgfesthekredttdefjeenucfhrhhomheplfhonhcuvfhurhhnvgihuceojhhonhdrthhurhhnvgihsegurhhonhgvtghouggvrdhorhhgrdhukheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepvddtteffkeevveejgeehgeelhfdtgefgieelgffgudetudefvdeggfeiiefftdevnecukfhppeekiedrudefledrudeijedrgedunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehhvghloheplgduledvrdduieekrddurddutdehngdpihhnvghtpeekiedrudefledrudeijedrgedupdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepjhhonhdrthhurhhnvgihsegurhhonhgvtghouggvrdhorhhgrdhukhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepvddprhgtphhtthhopeeurhhirghnrdfknhhglhhishesufihshhtvghmrghtihgtufifrdgrsgdrtggrpdhrtghpthhtoheptgihghifihhnqdgrphhpshestgihghifihhnrdgtohhm X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean Received: from [192.168.1.105] (86.139.167.41) by re-prd-rgout-004.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net (5.8.716.04) (authenticated as jonturney@btinternet.com) id 613A901C23419F73; Sat, 14 May 2022 14:09:49 +0100 Message-ID: <70619295-441f-4b6e-bafa-d6c0df655b2e@dronecode.org.uk> Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 14:09:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.0 Subject: Re: [ITP] asr-manpages, funny-manpages Content-Language: en-GB To: "cygwin-apps@cygwin.com" , Brian Inglis References: From: Jon Turney In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1193.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FORGED_SPF_HELO, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_NONE, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cygwin package maintainer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 13:09:52 -0000 On 07/05/2022 19:52, Brian Inglis wrote: > I would like to offer to package the following projects for Cygwin. > They have been extensively tested on my own system for decades. ;^> > They are offered on the major distros listed below, and the cygport > builds are available in my Google Drive folders. > > asr-manpages    20000406    alt.sysadmin.recovery manual pages > > A set of humorous manual pages developed on alt.sysadmin.recovery > (don't treat them seriously!). Some may be considered non-PC, NSFW, or > offensive. The authors recommend these man pages be installed on every > system. > [...] > > funny-manpages    2.3    humorous manual pages > A set of miscellaneous humorous manual pages (don't treat > them seriously!). Some may be considered non-PC, NSFW, or offensive. > You've been warned. Just a question about the package naming: we already have man-pages-{linux,posix} so is there any value in making these consistent?