Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: autoconf-15-1, autoconf2.7-2.71-1

[Brian Inglis <Brian.Inglis@SystematicSw.ab.ca>]

On 2021-12-07 13:16, Ken Brown wrote:
> [Redirected from the cygwin list, 
> https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2021-December/250149.html]
> 
> On 12/7/2021 3:08 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
>> On 12/5/2021 3:50 AM, Achim Gratz wrote:
>>> Autoconf upstream has stated that the 2.7x releases are not fully
>>> backwards compatible.  Cygwin therefore chose to provide a new
>>> autoconf2.7 package (keeping autoconf2.5 available) and modifying the
>>> wrapper script to allow packaging systems to set WANT_AUTOCONF=2.7 to
>>> select a newer autoconf version.  The default (when no explicit
>>> WANT_AUTOCONF is set) is still "2.5", which selects autoconf version
>>> 2.69 on Cygwin.

>> As you explained on IRC earlier today, what you meant is that the 
>> default for packages built via cygport is still 2.5.

>>> The default will change to "2.7" after some period of
>>> testing.
>>>
>>> Cygwin package maintainers are encouraged to set WANT_AUTOCONF=2.7 in
>>> their cygport configuration or in individual cygport files in order to
>>> check for regressions.

> I wonder if it would be better to make the default 2.7 in order to more 
> strongly encourage maintainers to try the latter.  They can always set 
> WANT_AUTOCONF=2.5 if they can't make it work.  But I would bet that most 
> difficulties that arise have already been found and fixed by Fedora.

Does Fedora build Windows exes?
Do most packages use libtool?
Remember gnulib? ;^>

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.
[Data in binary units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.]