From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com (mail-wm1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::331]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B150386F01D for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 17:18:07 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 7B150386F01D Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id 3so11108457wmg.4 for ; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 09:18:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ezaORfwr3jWkGNP0V7GRjtxD0T3vyMkq1SMwa8D4eXo=; b=lq3HsptMiyBk/OQQzMsYIW93YKBPBj5rntFdViLpBqR483xLJmvZbG0GpcaB8CG2tI QSBlL5oK5kVSeW6ZLK5lj0vk1DYXTvFjskIGhFvSzq/r/9p9ILWU92lRswz6rE2DOxNY RYy8F0M8Tt1q78WNocNGhJ023Y3hzYp8OgZnlei0juNSFU2MJMFO53/pYzdJ2bibWzNq 1ixMpit68CPQGMkPw2UELmvhTQ/nMXyKBdYEY7wZCt+Akff0xWgd/mGiHjH53h3GZjVb MaJ6R5ZyUN4mJcZD/52pkhg04gsTTUY2RoMYWhTpZ7Z80C/PSZ4UbMlfR9OcqfNuCisF tGNw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530xAnN2le/uqW9eRwQiAVB8dt5N6di4I848RcbsInvhyVT+Xw9C msAyDKCDy6DVohPD6lGPWSjqWIEV/HznMw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzVzNUhK000WFKDpXYjLTPX5kXRYIR2JVAX8nbELEe8rRKSwFIDB7TGF6jcjxFeVKre9q9wDA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:98cc:: with SMTP id a195mr8011806wme.150.1610212686601; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 09:18:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.121] (p5dda1f06.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.218.31.6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r13sm18139300wrt.10.2021.01.09.09.18.05 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 09 Jan 2021 09:18:06 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [ITA] binutils, mingw64-{i686,x86_64}-binutils To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <87k0sm838u.fsf@Rainer.invalid> From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: <7253f603-3174-6a3b-60f1-22047c062a5f@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2021 18:18:04 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87k0sm838u.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: it Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cygwin package maintainer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2021 17:18:09 -0000 On 09.01.2021 17:49, Achim Gratz wrote: > > I have finally figured out why building binutils (whatever version) > didn't work correctly with gcc-10, so I was able to build the current > release version of binutils 2.35.1 finally (and re-build the same > binutils version with itself). Enabling to move libbfd/libopcodes into > shared libraries has been prepared, but so far I have not been able to > build binutils that actually work (already the tests are failing). > > The updated cygport file (and patches, albeit non-active for the actual > configuration) is available on the playground branch: > > https://cygwin.com/git-cygwin-packages/?p=git/cygwin-packages/binutils.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/playground > > The build results on the CI: > > https://ci.appveyor.com/project/cygwin/scallywag/builds/37184120 > > > I have not yet started to work on the mingw64 packages. > > > Regards, > Achim. > changed from Jonathan Yong to you Thanks Marco