From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9723 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2008 14:16:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 9711 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Oct 2008 14:16:02 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (HELO QMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.96) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:15:04 +0000 Received: from OMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.35]) by QMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id YAUR1a0070ldTLk59EF1yF; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:15:01 +0000 Received: from helium ([69.140.173.30]) by OMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id YEF11a00F0fipUd3QEF1n5; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:15:01 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=w_pzkKWiAAAA:8 a=NxMQ3ME5086m_hpt8TwA:9 a=lMqXfSJotwVJEolp7eIA:7 a=V1pZ77VCUNFvV-f_RJRTTYMVTDgA:4 a=MxZ3bB5I4kYA:10 Received: from helium ([127.0.0.1] helo=D77E1BASCHULMA1.aa.ad.epa.gov) by helium with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KupLY-0000uy-Vd for cygwin-apps@cygwin.com; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:15:01 -0400 From: Andrew Schulman To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cygport-0.9.3 in release-2 Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <747eg4dsfpl4befpo8gb4qkgo3sm0d8fbi@4ax.com> References: <4906B2F8.4000708@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <4906B2F8.4000708@users.sourceforge.net> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archive: encrypt Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00087.txt.bz2 > If there are any changes you want to see in cygport, please let me know > ASAP; As I requested before at http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2008-09/msg00070.html, I routinely use Charles Wilson's patch for src_prep_fini_hook() (http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-01/msg00110.html), and would like to = see it included in cygport. As I explained in the thread referenced above, src_patch_hook() and src_unpack_hook() are not adequate substitutes for src_prep_fini_hook(), be= cause both of the former act *before* origsrc is mirrored to src. So, using them= it is not possible to make changes to src independently from origsrc. src_prep_fini_hook(), as Charles proposed it, is called after origsrc is mirrored to src, so that I can patch src independent of origsrc, and the ch= anges are captured in cygwin.patch-- which is essential for creating a working so= urce package. If you don't like src_prep_fini_hook(), then maybe src_unpack_hook() could = be moved down below the call to rsync, which would make it the same as src_prep_fini_hook(). Thanks, Andrew.