From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EB0C3858006 for ; Sun, 3 Jan 2021 16:22:33 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 8EB0C3858006 Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id m5so28445882wrx.9 for ; Sun, 03 Jan 2021 08:22:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=H01x/Zbav3ombIVGHIInifLYOP2/4XyxbIKrooLxiP8=; b=SqJAA6hi0l35t/tLfFrtCk0oC3Fxn0mKWs7zKsfglouLMTKIOH81EdXUia6WSwAkQv zIhheF7qSPm0AoNqf/4aCWCc/Gpa19e9Ue7itIGdVqmrq2YALpNBB01c9orswbAuRWsT M9M19FurN5FEfre5ju8LSdcnnuQaABAfXAgA8GGdQP8UC/yfPkntuNhCrnTdEZJy3wmv tVdQtHaVvLkbn++CSWdptU5cl7tCrJvXnN5EWD2V4lJTwXYjgLrxKPwicmAiB6UfwsHw mPir27GHrFyTndYJOHd2Wew8l0nzttXQUzj6ETca4DvitrivZzXj/W2N76ItgxGcheee aW3Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530hJL37CGthGl5/5qmgtQ/Q1sV1gNXgLgCPrQezSt/Xypjqo3zG GSJExsOvlkikEMqnO3yFq8aJ46Uqr/t06A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzp6BzzPoJq1uQ/zF0maS9vYGwu+QWSG7BLpgxC0zoe20/TFg2pctTgmp6etvvUXmpKQpFGCg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6a4c:: with SMTP id t12mr70230044wrw.249.1609690952643; Sun, 03 Jan 2021 08:22:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.121] (p5dda1f06.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.218.31.6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q73sm32387826wme.44.2021.01.03.08.22.31 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 03 Jan 2021 08:22:32 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [RFE] calm needs to know about ZStandard compressed archives To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <8735zt7j3t.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <875z4iou3b.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <871rf6otv7.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <6aebdeb5-82ab-03a1-31c1-9d36fe4aac22@gmail.com> <53032d89-0aff-b533-6e0f-3057def38c68@dronecode.org.uk> <87mtxqj9mp.fsf@Rainer.invalid> From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: <7c2fe573-7ee0-20a5-347a-19e93b5dba40@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2021 17:22:31 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87mtxqj9mp.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: it Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cygwin package maintainer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2021 16:22:34 -0000 On 03.01.2021 16:57, Achim Gratz wrote: > Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps writes: >> We will also need to modify cygport to stop automatically add >> OBSOLETES as most of this packages never existed > > I think the right thing to do is to stop having actual packages for > OBSOLETES and just emit the obsoltes: hint instead. >> an overall cleaning of obsoletes package may be useful in the >> near future. I need to work on it. > > The mailing list is full of folks that seem to update their > installations only after several years, so while I'm all for removing > the empty packages, the obsolete hints need to stay. I was referring only to the "empty packages" artificially created of course. > Regards, > Achim. >