From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cygwin-apps-return-37568-listarch-cygwin-apps=sources.redhat.com@cygwin.com>
Received: (qmail 11547 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2016 08:45:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com
List-Id: <cygwin-apps.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
Received: (qmail 11529 invoked by uid 89); 26 Jul 2016 08:45:13 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=herbert, H*Ad:D*gmx.de, H*i:sk:loom.20, H*MI:sk:loom.20
X-HELO: mout.gmx.net
Received: from mout.gmx.net (HELO mout.gmx.net) (212.227.17.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 08:45:05 +0000
Received: from [81.169.128.7] ([81.169.128.7]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MIdYi-1bUAuC0PyS-002GN9; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 10:45:00 +0200
Subject: Re: [ITP] FUSE 2.8
To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
References: <CAFUnBZheadBe+Dv-owRBBbp4x6-y+Wao=vC88sr1gM=5Fq3NnQ@mail.gmail.com> <D3B7A13E.A60B%billziss@navimatics.com> <CAFUnBZjZFjxe8fB3YBytc498ai3uHatLH651Yk3HJkZAywARyA@mail.gmail.com> <D3B805DC.A691%billziss@navimatics.com> <20160723104021.GA18159@calimero.vinschen.de> <D3B8EA73.A6D8%billziss@navimatics.com> <20160723174836.GD11373@calimero.vinschen.de> <D3B90017.A6F0%billziss@navimatics.com> <20160725073538.GF11373@calimero.vinschen.de> <D3BBC5D7.A7D3%billziss@navimatics.com> <loom.20160726T082243-435@post.gmane.org>
From: Herbert Stocker <hersto@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <81992397-64d2-bf0d-a7cd-9620a559a7a4@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 08:45:00 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <loom.20160726T082243-435@post.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:rnu+g8rIagA=:Xq9RHuwf4E72jdYu5FCgxt CHTReMjWbZLD6nA8hrz4SSmzvlotX8/XipciVVaJhl0q4EFzqNKs6KzbzbDXtQXij5ZrjtMXL DoroRTfOzmeH8AIZbKaYC21AC5eR3GVRcjT8qsDJEhi5bd6CXNh+onucMQkIJr0pXspbj7vIO T8yws8flJldgEWG1mQhQTdzEflOV1vqR2RzKIIcYZmfv5aOrTNtjHZvOsvXkVfjVf+WbCdKm/ Lg1rEezRG1cID1cpkcLWBWSMQjeb6UhSr0Pdsn+mIh04I3ZNRYZGk+UUWyKWcSZD0HwVhYd4N i1QOTcT+nKqYuV5an2UJ1/Aim4f9e/PdZbcx9X0xq1yZ4eDMAxtL10PATj6TfZp9p5Tg+HLCM j6oyJbRKDggkGuz4CssDXAauVr6jO4muHLK/76HTS66DorXLyDwlJhn1fOC/JbS4ls+/bwr+Q EvnzOZO0JqAhg/Ygb+f+yf8vw1Z0DczhQPF/Khp6yjprkR2jFmiyKL+QoNBwanmnHxZ6Ls2/A YdZDn4Kuj478rv/53JX13PKSdEaEhXiMM1L8C8MBAJsXcFwOmnCm8Ox9yVzmq2CtTgi4IejmK ERk7GoU5DlDGJyhwiFOLrIQ+53SXP+SHQ9xZHGgFDz4YyOyGfgBDU1Z3fllr+Z2PR0HDeVw2i g2O/Vj0reyIzm5ohNnWt6dKATSKMurHfF1fFHCajwA3iw65GD8Rl2mNA8lurFQNDcTL4Kpjwb oXMwyyIsU5Wzgu4EhdUV1xrAzsQ0xlLCRkH/pVPQNNfevKh/JoIBKPpZ46T1m4uq0lIcCkHSO eBN2KXM
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2016-07/txt/msg00081.txt.bz2

Hi all,

On 7/26/2016 8:27 AM, Mark Geisert wrote:
> You could define a package "fuse" with no contents and a dependency on
> package "winfsp-fuse".  Then later when/if another FUSE implementation
> becomes available, "somebody" could replace the "fuse" package with
> whatever is required to get alternatives support for the variants.

Does setup.exe already have a provision in the GUI to ask the user
which one they want to chose if two or more packages are able to
provide the (empty) fuse package?

> I'm wondering if "fuse-xxxx" is a better name template than "xxxx-fuse" in
> order to keep the variants near each other in setup.exe's displays.

good point.


Herbert Stocker