From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-x341.google.com (mail-wm1-x341.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::341]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5B8E38930F5 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 09:24:38 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org C5B8E38930F5 Received: by mail-wm1-x341.google.com with SMTP id a6so1068744wmm.5 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 02:24:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=b0NhlPJmlrMxxlfKlEGwNelb+uOcQ/FDZqFG6di7cVc=; b=m47WcC9LMm3HmIoM6pS7u8R2sUl993+Ok7Qyhx9p+nu075jw23A8bKPKIp3+Omo1uA 1n5pcJkz1B4bKuX35fOa15FRFtT+wqlbYBIN7JYBfmULUQ021Uw2HW9/LqKvy6+RRKIi KqkILR08XYbMGI0jaAMFqhYpuGk3J1q7jX5RzEGnho6xQVkC10xEz1g0HpbQxJOaO8DM c4kDn871CQOk+kVQ2wPiQUNJI5VdyBS1L+B1azGwxFRVKno0yUumHaLGg/YjXOe/CwX6 kf4KIwhqYiIGZfl59Lkun8XslbqL2q0OLq411oQ9MFplcJFG2ed7B/XZ5+5tIfPad5lb 7yNg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531CBhfhmKgd1fqYWZETVqvE57ud+ANMFKUdoCTuI+PdvdpB2k1P hHwpW4s4XR6nDmclr+5fpsw6Fw2f X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxu58qzGd0cKWxwKh+ZTMU1LxRlW7w0tMnlBDVWFSY+5BEqYTwfFNnsIzfVoOs6ZuQ3icXYDw== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c7d2:: with SMTP id z18mr994522wmk.149.1592472277676; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 02:24:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.121] (pd9ed5fcd.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.237.95.205]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v28sm2971865wra.77.2020.06.18.02.24.36 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Jun 2020 02:24:37 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [ITP] python36-wx 4.0.7.post2 To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <2b10fc1f-26e0-6507-2c2c-7330d1dd4f6d@gmail.com> <14fef64e-0fa5-1c78-e355-7f2e934c4c32@gmail.com> <3a29f449-5dc8-e476-1df3-116621410c82@gmail.com> <87h7vcxk11.fsf@Rainer.invalid> From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: <8316068f-6bbf-d3d9-c0dd-8b058e3fb751@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 11:24:34 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: it Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cygwin package maintainer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 09:24:40 -0000 On 18.06.2020 10:20, Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty via Cygwin-apps wrote: > On 17/06/2020 22:23, Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty via Cygwin-apps wrote: >> On 17/06/2020 20:24, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps wrote: >>> On 17.06.2020 10:41, Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty via Cygwin-apps wrote: >>>> On 15/06/2020 19:26, Achim Gratz wrote: >>>>> Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty via Cygwin-apps writes: >>>>>> Turns out just running "rebaseall" worked for me. I don't get any >>>>>> fork-related warnings/errors any more. >>>>> No it doesn't, it's a mere coincidence that it worked in your case. >>>>> You >>>>> shouldn't manually run rebaseall on Cygwin at all in fact, setup >>>>> perpetual postinstall actions take care of maintaing the rebase map. >>>>> If you ever have reason to believe that the rebase map needs a complete >>>>> rebuild, run "rebase-trigger full" and then run setup again. >>>>> >>>>> Fitting newly built DLL into the rebase map is correctly done by an >>>>> ephemeral rebase like the script Marco has shown you does. >>>> Good to know and thanks for the script Marco, seems to work well for me. >>>> >>>> The only patch Fedora seems to be using is one to disable the bundled >>>> SIP for building (which I think we need), so I believe this is now >>>> finished. Do I need to rebuild against the new version of Python that >>>> came out a few days ago for cygwin? >>>> >>>> Hamish >>>> >>> If still work NO. If don't, we need to understand why as they should be >>> binary compatible. > > Still works with the build from before, just double-checked. > > Am I good to go now? > > Hamish > sure. https://cygwin.com/packaging/key.html#sshkey