From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6172 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2018 18:35:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 6157 invoked by uid 89); 13 Jan 2018 18:35:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=appeal, Singles, singles, Hx-languages-length:1547 X-HELO: vsmx012.vodafonemail.xion.oxcs.net Received: from vsmx012.vodafonemail.xion.oxcs.net (HELO vsmx012.vodafonemail.xion.oxcs.net) (153.92.174.90) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 18:35:56 +0000 Received: from vsmx004.vodafonemail.xion.oxcs.net (unknown [192.168.75.198]) by mta-8-out.mta.xion.oxcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F4C8CDD48 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 18:35:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Gertrud (unknown [91.47.57.248]) by mta-8-out.mta.xion.oxcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 98C4DCDF84 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 18:35:49 +0000 (UTC) From: Achim Gratz To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Planned setup.ini changes for early 2018 References: <5e585f56-b4b1-753d-7ca8-0f7894194fa9@dronecode.org.uk> Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2018 18:35:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <5e585f56-b4b1-753d-7ca8-0f7894194fa9@dronecode.org.uk> (Jon Turney's message of "Wed, 10 Jan 2018 22:44:49 +0000") Message-ID: <871sit7gji.fsf@Rainer.invalid> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-VADE-STATUS: LEGIT X-SW-Source: 2018-01/txt/msg00039.txt.bz2 Jon Turney writes: > * De-duplicate source archives > > Source archives which are identical[2] between x86 and x86_64 will be > moved to paths starting src/ in the release area. You keep acting like using a new src/ hierarchy was already decided upon, yet I don't remember it even getting discussed. So, can we have that discussion before decision, please? To repeat, I think a separate src/ hierarchy would be a mistake, given where we are today, although it has a certain appeal from a greenfield perspective. But more to the point, there is nothing special about source archives (except that they're not architecture specific) that warrants putting them into their own hierarchy, IMHO. If they are going to get moved on deduplication (there are good reasons to move them and these likely outweight the benefits of just deleting them in one side of the hierarchy), we already have a place for that and that place is noarch/. That keeps everything in working order for folks who for whatever reason mirror the repository, even if the only mirror one architecture. If we also agree to actually move the files from a specific architecture branch to noarch/, any mirror operator can pre-populate the noarch/ hierarchy in order to minimize the amount of data to get synchronized (I suggest using x86_64). Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf Blofeld: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds