From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ej1-x629.google.com (mail-ej1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::629]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E70513851C0C for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 19:04:33 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org E70513851C0C Received: by mail-ej1-x629.google.com with SMTP id h21so14197902ejq.5 for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 12:04:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Rgbc+m9V+ccILD0jX1KkLS1Lw/I1qkRO0Xn1UgPOuuE=; b=FWhTUCNrK49DsCSD/kRTYDZCQd6t7B40D2ZHwI1Qc5bUSn7i2M/GzW6kF3ZazO+qpi RIIB/6iGcxzXxrleGFRquNhdu+VUC//F9BBHiOhKWmWf4eTIl/y2teplSA0BxLJTAR6e L4IgRABlCYCdIbPLUwOGx12qBhAL+2Z1GbhEYEtQ3Uq4yB2q6C+rDIk9G+nVyGgNyQ9M HBcofHmKahzIiIQA/lN9u19phk+GoMOLONgpEYmrWuO/wO4hiV0cS/X0Qvpm4E+ZqfIa J2Ne501TSn6fgax3jI/Iyal0Fw24nY6XmLxyZfwycOETwrgexRJtd0g3tcJz38f59X+x qsjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530LwtoRA+9Iduhvda5phXavH11Ivvr6LBQLAc6KGZLzmfsD3tf7 L8ol46WDL6rnCKPvM5XwR/lZcB0N X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzGzuhKYNqJb/C4r73mY1DGBq50bXODTQK5eIByFHowj8Qx0sQWE97/csWepAkPGNOixQWGTg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3748:: with SMTP id e8mr9298212ejc.181.1590174272782; Fri, 22 May 2020 12:04:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2003:cc:9f3c:6a41:b5fb:fbcb:30e8:dc59? (p200300cc9f3c6a41b5fbfbcb30e8dc59.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cc:9f3c:6a41:b5fb:fbcb:30e8:dc59]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id qo21sm8791394ejb.105.2020.05.22.12.04.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 22 May 2020 12:04:32 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [ITP] cairomm, as replacement for cairomm1.0 To: Ken Brown , "cygwin-apps@cygwin.com" References: <90537190-7a38-3d73-0241-a980bce25ed3@cornell.edu> From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: <878bb8be-cf32-d916-46d4-35f503aa9aec@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 21:04:31 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <90537190-7a38-3d73-0241-a980bce25ed3@cornell.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: it Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cygwin package maintainer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 19:04:35 -0000 On 22.05.2020 20:58, Ken Brown wrote: > On 5/15/2020 1:42 PM, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps wrote: >> On 15.05.2020 17:30, Ken Brown via Cygwin-apps wrote: >>> cygport file attached.  I've bumped the version to 1.12.2, which is >>> the latest stable upstream release.  Upstream has actually released >>> 1.15.5, but the News file says it's unstable and recommends that >>> distros not package it. >>> >>> I'm proposing an unversioned source package cairomm, as well as >>> unversioned devel and doc packages.  This is what we do with many >>> library packages, and it is consistent with Fedora's packaging. >>> >>> It will also ease future maintenance.  I've looked at the upstream >>> git repo, and there's been an ABI change from 1.0 to 1.14 and then to >>> 1.16. It would be annoying to have to create a new Cygwin package for >>> each such change. >>> >>> I'll wait for Yaakov to weigh in on this before I upload anything. >>> >>> The change might require some manual intervention on sourceware, to >>> rename the existing cairomm1.0 directory to cairomm. >>> >>> Ken >> >> added to the package list and assigned cairomm1.0 to you >> as will make any package movement easier > > I've decided to hold off on this for now.  There's no real need to > update cairomm1.0 at the moment, so any packaging change can wait until > there's a good reason for it. > > Ken noted