From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5248 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2012 05:27:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 5224 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Oct 2012 05:27:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,TW_SL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from emh07.mail.saunalahti.fi (HELO emh07.mail.saunalahti.fi) (62.142.5.117) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 05:27:47 +0000 Received: from saunalahti-vams (vs3-11.mail.saunalahti.fi [62.142.5.95]) by emh07.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E72540B8 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 08:27:46 +0300 (EEST) Received: from emh06.mail.saunalahti.fi ([62.142.5.116]) by vs3-11.mail.saunalahti.fi ([62.142.5.95]) with SMTP (gateway) id A04A444A53D; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 08:27:46 +0300 Received: from picasso.cante.net (a91-155-178-192.elisa-laajakaista.fi [91.155.178.192]) by emh06.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3421A69A4B for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 08:27:45 +0300 (EEST) From: Jari Aalto To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: ITP: xlsx2csv -- Convert xslx xml files to csv format References: <87vcee87no.fsf@picasso.cante.net> <50872148.3070609@etr-usa.com> Mail-Copies-To: poster Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 05:27:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <50872148.3070609@etr-usa.com> (Warren Young's message of "Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:59:20 -0600") Message-ID: <87hapkmoby.fsf@picasso.cante.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00281.txt.bz2 2012-10-24 01:59 Warren Young : | GTG. | | I hope you can work with the upstream author to fix the hexbarf | version number, though. The version number is based on Git version control repository (there are no official releases): 0.11+20120814+gitf54ab78 See e.g. http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/ crmsh_1.2.0+hg20121009-2.html flashcache_1.0+git20121013-1.html ... | Does upset know how to cope with such version numbers I believe it does if it uses standard string comparison, where, as long as the version strings sort before and after, all it good. Using date followed by exact commit id always sorts in the right order. The "+" sign ensures that it sorts before dot(.): 0.11+20120814+gitf54ab78 < 0.11.1 ASCII table order[1]: + Dec 44 . Dec 46 Jari [1] http://www.asciitable.com/