[ITP] perl-Stow

[ITP] perl-Stow

[Andrew Schulman]

Please make me the maintainer of the new perl-Stow package, which is being split
off from stow.  Thanks, Andrew.

Re: [ITP] perl-Stow

[Marco Atzeri]

On 7/22/2015 3:10 PM, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> Please make me the maintainer of the new perl-Stow package, which is being split
> off from stow.  Thanks, Andrew.
>

Will you have a separate source package or not ?

If the source package is the same you don't need a a separate line
just a split of current main package

something like

$ find . -type f
./GraphicsMagick-1.3.21-2-src.tar.xz
./GraphicsMagick-1.3.21-2.tar.xz
./GraphicsMagick-debuginfo/GraphicsMagick-debuginfo-1.3.21-2.tar.xz
./GraphicsMagick-debuginfo/setup.hint
./libGraphicsMagick++11/libGraphicsMagick++11-1.3.21-2.tar.xz
./libGraphicsMagick++11/setup.hint
./libGraphicsMagick-devel/libGraphicsMagick-devel-1.3.21-2.tar.xz
./libGraphicsMagick-devel/setup.hint
./libGraphicsMagick3/libGraphicsMagick3-1.3.21-2.tar.xz
./libGraphicsMagick3/setup.hint
./libGraphicsMagickWand2/libGraphicsMagickWand2-1.3.21-2.tar.xz
./libGraphicsMagickWand2/setup.hint
./perl-Graphics-Magick/perl-Graphics-Magick-1.3.21-2.tar.xz
./perl-Graphics-Magick/setup.hint
./setup.hint

Regards
MArco

Re: [ITP] perl-Stow

[Achim Gratz]

Andrew Schulman writes:
> Please make me the maintainer of the new perl-Stow package, which is being split
> off from stow.

Are you really making a new package (based on CPAN)?  If you just split
out a subpackage from the current stow package, the you don't need to do
an ITP and the sub-package goes into a perl-Stow subdirectory in stow/,
pointing to stow as the source package.  Cygport does most of the work
for you in that case.


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf Q+, Q and microQ:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds

Re: [ITP] perl-Stow

[Andrew Schulman]

> On 7/22/2015 3:10 PM, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > Please make me the maintainer of the new perl-Stow package, which is being split
> > off from stow.  Thanks, Andrew.
> >
> 
> Will you have a separate source package or not ?
> 
> If the source package is the same you don't need a a separate line
> just a split of current main package

Right, yes.  No, same source package so you're right, no new maintainer line is
needed.  Thanks, Andrew