From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12101 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2012 15:05:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 12079 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Dec 2012 15:05:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,TW_YG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from emh01.mail.saunalahti.fi (HELO emh01.mail.saunalahti.fi) (62.142.5.107) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:05:34 +0000 Received: from saunalahti-vams (vs3-11.mail.saunalahti.fi [62.142.5.95]) by emh01.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with SMTP id 33BC99010E for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:05:32 +0200 (EET) Received: from emh03.mail.saunalahti.fi ([62.142.5.109]) by vs3-11.mail.saunalahti.fi ([62.142.5.95]) with SMTP (gateway) id A0412B2C3FB; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:05:32 +0200 Received: from picasso.cante.net (a91-155-190-197.elisa-laajakaista.fi [91.155.190.197]) by emh03.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7341887ED for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:05:31 +0200 (EET) From: Jari Aalto To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: ctags recursion broken? [ATTN: ctags, xemacs-tags maintainers] References: <786EBDA1AC46254B813E200779E7AD36028CB12E@srv1163ex1.flightsafety.com> <20121212093952.GA15883@calimero.vinschen.de> Mail-Copies-To: poster Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:05:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Aaron Schneider's message of "Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:48:49 +0100") Message-ID: <87vcc7fgzo.fsf@picasso.cante.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00042.txt.bz2 On 2012-12-12 15:48, Aaron Schneider wrote: | On 12/12/2012 10:39, Corinna Vinschen wrote: | >Oh boy, how long do we have this collisions? For years, it seems. | | I request a feature to detect package collision, and furthermore | suggest which package to install when an user tries to run a program | which is not installed but is available from a package. This helps: $ cygcheck --help ... -f, --find-package find the package to which FILE belongs $ cygcheck -f /usr/bin/ls coreutils-8.15-1 I wouldn't want the screen to be filled with messages every time I mispell a command that might exist in some package. Jari