From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtpout2.vodafonemail.de (smtpout2.vodafonemail.de [145.253.239.133]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8927039CBC3E for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 05:55:21 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 8927039CBC3E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=nexgo.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=Stromeko@nexgo.de Received: from smtp.vodafone.de (smtpa04.fra-mediabeam.com [10.2.0.35]) by smtpout2.vodafonemail.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1EC9121DA1 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 07:55:20 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nexgo.de; s=vfde-smtpout-mb-15sep; t=1618206920; bh=3znml5irMCmgsYqBuVL3QiUFhVxaLbSltMsty/6+mrg=; h=From:To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=AsXP7fxEM+2uwWuyFOMrzRNcFROQZZ8vWWejOoZoK4gdf/kWFBloyWKv/vjws/Kf3 USBx0bD+kamMf4vblLZlFHQykZQx+MTskgU/72yWoLz7gRA7GpbP+zI2ON+ge2Iu4M uzozEB6F4QNEBS5EKZbvA6vmmuJtA/VVM5/SdAhM= Received: from Otto (p57b9d8ab.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.185.216.171]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.vodafone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 55C1114026E for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 05:55:20 +0000 (UTC) From: ASSI To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: libgccjit-0 References: <8735vyyuq9.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <16f71de2-c132-f1e5-b630-9d1b5a625906@cornell.edu> <87pmz0yg6x.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <52ae4245-a8e8-8b0e-cdd9-22159bfe0c31@cornell.edu> <878s5oy53y.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <1c31d670-2f14-1c20-18d7-dc8a93d74846@cornell.edu> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 07:55:19 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1c31d670-2f14-1c20-18d7-dc8a93d74846@cornell.edu> (Ken Brown via Cygwin-apps's message of "Sun, 11 Apr 2021 16:29:32 -0400") Message-ID: <87zgy4ujw8.fsf@Otto.invalid> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-purgate-type: clean X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information) X-purgate: clean X-purgate-size: 1041 X-purgate-ID: 155817::1618206920-00004492-2C5459F6/0/0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cygwin package maintainer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 05:55:22 -0000 Ken Brown via Cygwin-apps writes: > Sorry, I spoke too soon. It's not even working right on x86_64. In > my first build, the ordinary byte-compiled files (.elc) were already > present, and that somehow prevented the native-compiled files (.eln) > from being built. I just tried 'make bootstrap' and the build won't > complete because of fork errors like this (on x86_64): > > 0 [main] emacs 5400 child_info_fork::abort: address space needed > by 'jit-lock-05ec1a9b-73eb7028.eln' (0x400000) is already > occupied > > In an earlier attempt it was a different .eln file that was involved, > but the address was the same (0x400000). Disappointing, but semi-expected. Can you tell me what peflags thinks are the characteristics of the .eln files produced? You could also check if an ephemeral rebase helps. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ SD adaptation for Waldorf Blofeld V1.15B11: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada