From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-x334.google.com (mail-wm1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::334]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7010385DC03 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 17:41:25 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org C7010385DC03 Received: by mail-wm1-x334.google.com with SMTP id b12so3493296wmj.3 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:41:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XtgaFLCtDQS9x5uyuoJcmMqugZPyfh0CwDRCp3+2oeE=; b=USk4NqmIDtqhjuSC2Dwo+40WU1aqKh8B7XYvGXvSGOupZLH/XduZCIs4sih+vP7QyL E+dbauqOTI/fDhQ8o9cD2dX+nKKboiwEytN5MqKno01y4EPcn1STRciVepshWrCVlRvi Gk2+VopQ6kBbn40g+Q8oawWoKKse6ztDUvFy0ALmVGmTLUOmpPiJTPCbhEevv80Noa0R kdzWAfNNiMgFlQSEObw4+JgKl30IuxbNUvJLWNAMWYQuA/ERYLpamlt6JyJ9daAo8iIc 0vpLsG9OgklskezIFTj3pk1GlvmTzqBV1l7fbEvjUEEJ+fgUZzvWvNS9umBYRnvcYTI0 vwuw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ13eWAExb8sRDf8hgsCiFMWm8M2GQxLuNb78GWO+U134hryruwr 5Ur4d4l8/zblTh1WZ0PnvnVCDRUlZ3o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtSPjmFkflc2bRSMDDLhCvXMG870KIYiLhAn/foLW5EY3NFKCljcn2Pv2Hh8udebl9bbBCTEw== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c219:: with SMTP id x25mr4409492wmi.23.1585676483760; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:41:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2003:ee:6719:2901:c5a2:5ccd:f45f:497d? (p200300EE67192901C5A25CCDF45F497D.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:ee:6719:2901:c5a2:5ccd:f45f:497d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a186sm4612622wmh.33.2020.03.31.10.41.22 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:41:23 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: socat test 2.0.0-b9-1 To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <87h7y4cx9v.fsf@Otto.invalid> From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: <8a936ad1-6c0b-6e7c-6686-5829a13a1909@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 19:41:20 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87h7y4cx9v.fsf@Otto.invalid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cygwin package maintainer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 17:41:27 -0000 Am 31.03.2020 um 18:19 schrieb ASSI: > Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps writes: >> It will also make a hypothetical future upgrade hard. >> >> Is 2.0.0-1 major of 2.0.0-b9-1 ? > > Upstream would probably say yes, but they might chose to release a 2.0.1 instead. > The problem is how setup logic will judge. In alphabetic order, letters are bigger than number so 2.0.0-b9-1 > 2.0.0-1 and upgrade will likely not happen If ever they release a new version Marco