From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 92829 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2015 01:59:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Sender: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 92718 invoked by uid 89); 6 Jun 2015 01:59:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: resqmta-po-02v.sys.comcast.net Received: from resqmta-po-02v.sys.comcast.net (HELO resqmta-po-02v.sys.comcast.net) (96.114.154.161) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 01:59:47 +0000 Received: from resomta-po-16v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.240]) by resqmta-po-02v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id cpzS1q0065BUCh401pzlEQ; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 01:59:45 +0000 Received: from 5200-glenwood.net ([69.140.37.22]) by resomta-po-16v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id cpzk1q0090UgAyD01pzldZ; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 01:59:45 +0000 Received: from helium.5200-glenwood.net ([192.168.1.2]) by helium with smtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1Z13Oi-0006qt-8f for cygwin-apps@cygwin.com; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 21:59:44 -0400 From: Andrew Schulman To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [ITP] unison2.48 Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2015 01:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: <8pk4na1m8e85b7206jutfuck7979abqmqp@4ax.com> References: <1433530021.14544.25.camel@cygwin.com> <1433543067.14544.77.camel@cygwin.com> In-Reply-To: <1433543067.14544.77.camel@cygwin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archive: encrypt X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg00052.txt.bz2 > On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 16:16 -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: > > > On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 12:06 -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: > > > BTW do you have any plans to build the GTK GUI versions? > >=20 > > Not immediately. The last time I tried was several years ago, and ther= e was > > some problem with lablgtk that kept it from working. That was many ver= sions of > > unison and lablgtk ago, so it would be worth trying again, but only if = people > > want it. >=20 > I have had a working lablgtk in Ports for some time now. Have you tried > that? No, I haven't looked at it in at least 5 years. > > For myself, I use command line unison every day, but have no need for t= he GUI. > > And there's a Windows native build GUI, which probably meets many users= ' needs, > > although not necessarily Cygwin users. So I don't know how many people= would > > want the GTK GUI. >=20 > Well, I wouldn't outright replace the CUI version with the GUI (even > though IIRC the latter can work from the command-line as well with > DISPLAY unset) due to the additional dependencies, but as a separate > command it would be a plus. I always thought the GUI versions would be separate packages - unison2.48gt= k, etc. I'll poll to find out what the interest is. Andrew