When a package (with specified version) is contained in multiple 
repositories, we register in packagemeta the last one we see.  But if 
libsolv decides that the package needs to be installed, its solution may 
arbitrarily specify one from a different repo.  This caused me some 
confusion when debugging an unrelated issue, and I created the attached 
patch to "fix" it.

In retrospect, I'm not sure this patch is right, but I'm sending it 
anyway for the sake of discussion.  My hesitation comes from the fact 
that libsolv might have a good reason for preferring the one it chose, 
e.g., if we've assigned priorities to the repos.  On the other hand, if 
we've gone to the trouble of assigning priorities, shouldn't packagemeta 
reflect our choice?

I'm of two minds here.

Ken